Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements
 
You Are Here: Read an Article > View All Posts for the Article > Read a Post
 
Read a Post for More Than Technique: Mixing Methods as an Aspiring Methodology
 
Reply to this Post
 

Mixed methods or Mixed up methods?

Posted By: jim field on May 24, 2019
 
I fully agree with the author, especially with the biggest sin in MM in my opinion: na´ve borrowing. Often in MM, methodology is treated like a room full of furniture "things": add a Victorian chair here (semi structured interview) and a Shaker bookshelf (Likert scale survey) there, and then, worse make a claim that you're "triangulating" methods. Our graduate students are particularly susceptible to this "additive" version, many lacking the epistemological, ontological and philosophical grounding to make wise choices (let alone justify them).

Jim Field,
University of Calgary
Thread Hierarchy
 Mixed methods or Mixed up methods? by jim field on May 24, 2019
     
    Member Center
    In Print
    This Month's Issue

    Submit
    EMAIL

    Twitter

    RSS