The Road to Becoming a Scientist: A Mixed Methods Investigation of Supports and Barriers Experienced by First-Year Community College Students
by Xueli Wang, Kelly Wickersham, Seo Young Lee, Na Lor, Ashley N. Gaskew & Amy Prevost - 2020
Background: Although a long line of research has been devoted to transfer pathways in general, there remains limited work on the capacity for community colleges to cultivate STEM baccalaureate transfer. In particular, both quantitative and qualitative evidence is extremely sparse on how STEM-aspiring students beginning at community colleges experience supports and barriers on their journey to pursue a STEM baccalaureate.
Purpose: This mixed-methods study addresses the question: What salient factors are associated with beginning community college STEM studentsí decisions to transfer into baccalaureate STEM programs, and how do students describe the supports and barriers they experienced specifically pertaining to these factors?
Research Design: Guided by the STEM Transfer model, we carried out this research using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. We incorporated survey, administrative, and interview data from three large two-year institutions in a Midwestern state. We applied Artificial Neural Network (ANN) techniques to identify factors associated with beginning community college STEM studentsí decisions to transfer into baccalaureate STEM programs. Based on the factors that emerged from ANN, we analyzed the interview data to give meaning to the identified factors using studentsí rich descriptions of their experiences.
Findings: Results from the ANN revealed that studentsí initial attitudes toward science was the most salient factor related to transfer in STEM. Following that, GPA, studentsí initial attitudes toward math, transfer capital, being employed full time, major declaration, science preparation in high school, income levels above middle level, and transfer efficacy also turned out to be important variables shaping studentsí transfer in STEM. Qualitative results further illustrated how the factors from the ANN exerted their impact.
Conclusions: This mixed-methods research illuminated significant factors shaping the road to becoming a scientist, as well as how those factors manifested their influences within the contexts of studentsí educational journeys. Through this approach, we were able to establish the significance of influential factors without presuming directionality and leverage the interview data to disentangle how these factors functioned independently and together in sophisticated and nuanced ways. Our study brings forth a deeper understanding of community college studentsí STEM pathways, including the many plot twists and processes involved to overcome challenges and maintain progress.
To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below: