Rearguing Brown v. Board of Education


by David J. Armor - August 15, 2007

Many commentators explain the Supreme Court decision in the Seattle and Louisville desegregation cases as simply a "rightward" shift of the Roberts Court. In fact, it reflects a far more complex disagreement over the meaning of Brown that has been going on for nearly 40 years. Justice Kennedy is now at the center of that dispute, and he disagreed in major ways with both the dissenters and his other four colleagues in the majority. Indeed, one can argue that the Seattle decision shifts the Court "leftward" because, for the first time, five Justices see a compelling government interest in reducing de facto racial isolation.


To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Rearguing Brown v. Board of Education
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record, Date Published: August 15, 2007
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 14584, Date Accessed: 11/18/2019 5:29:42 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review