Not So Fast: A Slow Response to Jim Dwight and Jim Garrison’s Manifesto


by Linda O'Neill - November 21, 2005

In a "Manifesto for Instructional Technology," Jim Dwight and Jim Garrison claim that "hyperpedagogy" can be effective in dislodging the dogmatic metaphysics and structuralist concepts dominating educational curriculum. Rather than addressing the complex and richly supported arguments in the Manifesto, this response is limited to questions arising from three related claims. The first is that instructional designers using traditional theories "effectively destroy hyperspace and hypertime." The second is that navigating and altering texts in hyperspace leads to a greater sense of agency. The third is that educators have an "ethical obligation" to help learners become "more suited to such a malleable environment." The purpose of this response is a continuation of the conversation that Dwight and Garrison have initiated.


To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Not So Fast: A Slow Response to Jim Dwight and Jim Garrison’s Manifesto
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record, Date Published: November 21, 2005
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 12244, Date Accessed: 9/20/2020 4:18:03 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review