Scale for the Measurement of Quality in English Composition by Young People: The Quality of Judges


by Milo B. Hillegas - 1912

The question of what individual or group of individuals represents the best judges of English composition is a difficult one to answer. The data at hand do not show any marked differences between the various sets of judges so far as uniformity of judgment is concerned or faithfulness to the proper order of the samples. In order that some definite conclusion might be reached concerning the reliability of judges, the following scale of penalties for placing samples in the wrong order was developed. Where the differences between samples are very great the penalty for misplacing has been made correspondingly large. Thus the difference between samples 627 and 534 is 129. If the judge considers sample 534 better than sample 627, he is guilty of a much greater error than he would be in placing sample 571 before sample 220, where the difference is only 15. In the latter case the penalty was arbitrarily fixed at I while in the former it was placed at 6.


To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Scale for the Measurement of Quality in English Composition by Young People: The Quality of Judges
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 13 Number 4, 1912, p. 51-55
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 10173, Date Accessed: 9/19/2020 9:15:13 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review