Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements
 
You Are Here: Discussion > View Posts for the Religion Topic > Read a Post
 
Read a Post
 
Reply to this Post
 

Clergy and SARS

Posted By: Alex Nelson on September 4, 2003
 
It appears to me that you assume that the priest is acting only in self interest by introducing some practices to restruct the transfer of the virus. I would think that the priest does have a right to protect himself; he has also a responsibility to avoid being a carrier of the disease. What if you are the person in a Holy Communion line who receives the host after a carrier of the virus? Would you not be indignant if it turned out that you became infected through saliva from the preceding person's mouth?

In Australia, receiving Communion in the hand is the more regular practice. Reconciliation within the Mass is not regular, but in critical circumstances it seems sensible.

Alex Nelson
Thread Hierarchy
 The Clergy's Response to SARS by Pearl Polestico on May 5, 2003
 
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS