| Read a Post |
| |
| Reply to this Post |
| |
Tracking
|
| Posted By: Eliot Larson on January 22, 2003 |
| |
| As a middle school principal I have always found this topic to be particularly difficult to discuss with my faculty and parents because it is so emotionally charged, and distracting. I have come to the conclusion that student achievement is less a function of being in/on? the right track and has more to do with a teacher's expectations not only for his/her students, but also the expectations they hold for themselves. This is the only way I can make sense of the "debate" between heterogeneous v. homogeneous grouping where the data varies so widely. I also feel uncomfortable with the "science" of sorting where teachers are so certain that a student is a level __?___ student versus another student who is definitely a level __??___ student. The criteria teachers apply to make these judgements usually seem to be very limited. |
|
| Thread Hierarchy |
 Tracking....good or bad? by Christina Rhoades on November 24, 2002
-
Ability Grouping, tracking, etc. by Louise Epstein on November 25, 2002
-
Tracking by Jill Slisz on December 7, 2002
-
Ability Grouping at the College Level by William Brown on January 8, 2003
-
Tracking and Issues of Equal Access by Kim Tolley on January 14, 2003
-
Tracking advanced kids by Tammy Steele on January 15, 2003
-
Tracking advanced kids by Tammy Steele on January 15, 2003
-
Tracking by Eliot Larson on January 22, 2003
-
Tracking is a systemic way of sorting by Wendy Gudalewicz on March 28, 2003
|
|
