Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements
 
You Are Here: Read an Article > View All Posts for the Article > Read a Post
 
Read a Post for Liked Your Textbook. . . But I’ll Never Use it in the Courses I Teach
 
Reply to this Post
 

Re: Re: would appreciate a rejoinder

Posted By: Angus Mcmurtry on August 24, 2015
 
Dear Dr. Chew,

Thank you for your considered response. I can’t claim to understand all of it, not having a background in neuroscience. But the phrase “every behaviour of the student can be mapped as biochemical or physiological activity of a fairly specific sort” caught my attention. I certainly agree that learning and behaviour involves measurable physiological changes. I just disagree with the idea that this should necessarily be described as acquiring and processing information — as if our heads are cabinets or computers into which files from the outside world are placed, processed and represented.

When we learn a sport, for example, our muscles, brain and other parts of our nervous systems no doubt reorganize themselves to be able to cope with that activity. But that does not mean that our muscles and nervous system are primarily acquiring, processing or representing information about the ball, racket or dumbbell that we are interacting with. I believe that the same could be said about learning to speak, write or do math. No ‘information particles’ or other things are transmitted from the outside world and then stored or processed in our head. Rather, we reorganize ourselves including our thinking to be able to cope with that activity.

I therefore prefer more metaphors like construction/construal, adaptation and evolution to the mechanical metaphors used in behaviourism and information processing.

Angus
Thread Hierarchy
 would appreciate a rejoinder by Angus Mcmurtry on August 18, 2015
 
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS