Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13

Capacity-Building for District Reform: The Role of Instructional-Coach Teams

by Sarah Galey-Horn - 2020

Background/Context: This study contributes to our growing understanding of coaches’ role in district reform by introducing instructional-coach teams as a potentially important concept for understanding coaching activities that support systemic reform. Prior research shows that instructional coaches leverage their position between the district office and schools to coordinate policy implementation. This study builds on that analysis by adding a group dimension to instructional coaching at the district level. No other study to date has focused on the collective behaviors of coaches that facilitate reform efforts.

Purpose/Objective/RQ/Focus of Study: The purpose of this study is to examine the practices of effective instructional-coach teams and conceptualize the role of coach teams in district reform.

Research Design: I used cross-case analysis that relied on social-network, questionnaire, interview, and observational methods as sources of evidence to analyze how instructional coaches work together to build capacities for district reform. I identified two successful district-level coach teams with an explicit mandate to support reform efforts that were, however, operating in very different district contexts. The focus of this analysis was to identify and compare the circumstances that present in both cases and help explain why these districts have effective coach teams.

Findings: My findings describe how coach teams develop institutional capacities that enable districts to respond to policy demands. I find that differences in curriculum policy, district reform context, and professional collaboration are associated with differences in the teams’ relational structures. I link these differences to common process gains resulting from the collective working of coach teams. I found three important process gains: intranet systems, collaborative problem-solving, and collective expertise. Although both teams produced all three, they implemented process gains in very different ways.

Conclusions/Recommendations: This comparative study demonstrates the conceptual utility of instructional-coach teams for understanding the link between coaching and systemic district reform. More theory and research are needed to better understand the behaviors of teams of educators, and particularly instructional coaches, engaged in collective work to support district reform.

To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
Purchase this Article
Purchase Capacity-Building for District Reform: The Role of Instructional-Coach Teams
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 122 Number 10, 2020, p. 1-40
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 23443, Date Accessed: 3/8/2021 7:56:46 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Sarah Galey-Horn
    University of Edinburgh
    E-mail Author
    SARAH GALEY-HORN, Ph.D., is a postdoctoral fellow in social and epistemic network analysis at the University of Edinburgh. Her work focuses on using social network analysis to examine educational policy issues. Her research interests include instructional coaching, district reform, policy implementation, and idea-based policy change. Her current projects focus on developing network interventions to support cross-sector working groups that implement STEM education and school-to-work programs. Dr. Galey-Horn’s forthcoming article in AERJ, “Building Consensus: Idea Brokerage in Teacher Policy Networks,” examines the link between policy actors who broker ideas within advocacy coalitions and the convergence of ideas in policy debates.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue