Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements
 

Coaching in Context: Exploring Conditions That Shape Instructional Coaching Practice


by Maggie Quinn Hannan & Jennifer Lin Russell - 2020

Background/Context: The literature shows that one constant in coaching is the high degree of variation in coach roles and contexts, suggesting that understanding coaching practice requires that we also understand the role structures and organizational conditions that shape coaches’ work. Research on both instructional coaching and instructional change is increasingly attending to the organizational and social factors that shape, facilitate, and constrain the web of interactions that coaching work comprises. Past research points to the complex systems and social networks that shape critical elements of coaching practice, emphasizing the interdependency of organizational processes and the critical importance of considering not only the outcomes of implementation, but also the contextual factors that shape them.

Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study: Given that multilayered social, technical, and organizational factors shape the practice and impact of instructional coaching, understanding the combinations of factors that are most consequential is key for both policy implementation and instructional coaching research. Consequently, understanding coaching requires attending to specific practices, the structural contexts in which those practices are embedded, and varied implementation processes across system levels and diverse school districts. Therefore, we built this study on the foundational idea that coaching work inherently and continuously interacts with the complex systems in which it takes place and that understanding and analyzing coaching requires attending to the organizational and social structures that shape it. Accordingly, this paper focuses on the following research question: What contextual conditions facilitate and constrain coaching, and why?

Research Design: To understand the interactions between coaching work and these many social and technical factors, we investigated how a group of coaches implemented a mathematics coaching model, focusing specifically on the relationship between coaching contexts and coaching practice. Our case-focused, mixed-methods approach, which included both qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and case-study methods, allowed us to explore the interrelationships between coaching and the system conditions that shape, enable, and constrain instructional change.

Conclusions/Recommendations: Our findings support the argument that coaching cannot be extricated from the surrounding system factors that shape it. On the contrary, we found that supports for and barriers to robust coaching practice are context-specific phenomena, suggesting that any coaching intervention ought to be tailored to its specific organizational location. Accordingly, we argue that different combinations of contributing factors can affect coaching in different ways, thereby contributing to the theory that a nested-systems perspective on instructional coaching is key to understanding its effects.



To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Coaching in Context: Exploring Conditions That Shape Instructional Coaching Practice
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 122 Number 10, 2020, p. 1-40
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 23438, Date Accessed: 11/28/2020 3:12:03 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
 
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
 
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Maggie Quinn Hannan
    Carnegie Mellon University
    E-mail Author
    MAGGIE QUINN HANNAN, Ph.D., is the associate director for K–12 in Carnegie Mellon’s Simon Initiative. She earned her doctorate at the University of Pittsburgh’s Learning Research and Development Center (LRDC). Her research focuses on scaling educational change, large-scale collaborative improvement efforts, and fostering equity in educational technology.
  • Jennifer Lin Russell
    University of Pittsburgh
    E-mail Author
    JENNIFER LIN RUSSELL, Ph.D., is an associate professor in the School of Education and a Research Scientist at the Learning Research and Development Center (LRDC) at the University of Pittsburgh. Her research examines policy and other educational improvement initiatives through an organizational perspective.
 
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS