Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13

Showing Up: Disparities in Chronic Absenteeism Between Students With and Without Disabilities in Traditional Public Schools

by Michael A. Gottfried, Leanna Stiefel, Amy Ellen Schwartz & Bryant Hopkins - 2019

Background: While chronic absenteeism hurts all students, one particularly vulnerable group, students with disabilities (SWDs), has received little attention in research or policy. Particularly troubling is the dearth of research into the patterns of absences for SWDs and GENs who attend school together in urban school systems, given relatively higher absenteeism when compared to suburban and rural districts.

Research Questions: First, how do rates of chronic absenteeism compare between SWDs and students without disabilities (GENs) attending the same schools (hereafter traditional schools)? Second, are there differences between SWDs who are educated in “GEN-majority” classrooms and those educated in “SWD-majority” classrooms? Finally, do these patterns differ for students with different disabilities?

Subjects: Our study consists of GENs and SWDs in grades 1–6 who attended a traditional NYC public school between 2006 and 2012. Our sample includes 653,736 students across 37,867 classrooms, and 1,148 public elementary schools. Measures include race/ethnicity, gender, age, foreign-born status, limited English proficiency, free/reduced price lunch eligibility, grade level, classroom ID, school ID, the number of days each student was absent, and the total number of school days each student was registered in the district. For SWDs, the data include indicators for the thirteen disability classifications defined under IDEA and a primary assigned special education setting.

Research Design: We begin with a baseline model, where being chronically absent (i.e., missing 10% or more of the school year) is regressed on an indicator for being a SWD, controlling for grade and year. We build on this model by first including demographic control variables, then school fixed effects, and finally classroom fixed effects. We then explore this model for differences by type of classroom setting as well as by type of disability.

Findings: Chronic absenteeism is considerably higher for SWDs than GENs in traditional schools, and there is important heterogeneity by disability classifications. Specifically, students with emotional disturbances exhibit extremely high rates of chronic absenteeism and the largest group of SWDs, students with learning disabilities, have quite high rates as well. Further, SWDs in GEN-majority classrooms are less likely to be chronically absent than those in SWD-majority classrooms, again with variation by disability.

Conclusions: As the nationwide trend of providing SWDs with more education in GEN-majority classrooms continues to press forward, our study shows that increasingly GEN-majority settings are associated with fewer absences for SWDs. And while school attendance, among other non-achievement outcomes, are not the primary focus of IDEA, our findings point to how some school settings might be beneficial to some but put others at risk.

To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
Purchase this Article
Purchase Showing Up: Disparities in Chronic Absenteeism Between Students With and Without Disabilities in Traditional Public Schools
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 121 Number 8, 2019, p. 1-34
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 22755, Date Accessed: 6/13/2021 10:13:43 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Michael Gottfried
    University of California, Santa Barbara
    E-mail Author
    MICHAEL A. GOTTFRIED is an associate professor in the Gevirtz Graduate School of Education at UC Santa Barbara. His research interests pertain to attendance and truancy as well as students with disabilities. Recent publication: Gottfried, M.A. (2017). The role of attending center-based care for kindergarten-aged children with disabilities. Teachers College Record, 119(2), 1–37.
  • Leanna Stiefel
    New York University
    E-mail Author
    LEANNA STIEFEL is professor of economics and education policy at NYU’s Wagner and Steinhardt Schools. Her current research focuses on urban education policy in areas such as small high school reforms, student mobility, and special education policy. Recent publication: Stiefel, L., Shiferaw, M., Schwartz, A. E., & Gottfried, M. (2018) Who feels included in school? Examining feelings of inclusion among students with disabilities, Educational Researcher, 47(2),105–120.
  • Amy Schwartz
    Syracuse University
    E-mail Author
    AMY ELLEN SCHWARTZ is the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Professor of Public Affairs at the Maxwell School at Syracuse University. Her interests span issues in education policy, urban economics, and public finance and her current research focuses on special education policy, student mobility, and the relationship between neighborhoods, schools, and child health and education outcomes. Article: Schwartz, A. E., Stiefel, L., & Rothbart, M. W. (2016). Do top dogs rule in middle school? Evidence on bullying, safety, and belonging. American Educational Research Journal, 53(5), 1450–1484.
  • Bryant Hopkins
    New York University
    E-mail Author
    BRYANT HOPKINS is a doctoral candidate at NYU’s Wagner School of Public Service. His current research focuses on urban education policy in areas including teacher mobility and special education policy.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue