Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13

Human Conditions for Teaching: The Place of Pedagogy in Arendt’s Vita Activa

by Chris Higgins - 2010

Background/Context: If education centrally involves self-cultivation, and the teacher’s own robust selfhood is necessary for inspiring self-cultivation in students, then teacherly self-cultivation is a necessary condition of education. But teaching is seen as a helping profession, where helping others always seems, in practice if not in principle, to preclude helping oneself. Some scholars refer to teaching as a praxis, a form of ethical/political conduct where knowing and doing become fused, where freedom is enacted. But is this simply wishful thinking? Perhaps, as institutionalized, teachers are a cog in a bureaucratic machine, or at best selfless servants of their students in a “noble” calling. This study asks what aspects of teaching, if any, might nurture the teacher’s own quest to flourish, without thus becoming a selfish betrayal of the role. What might it mean to speak of teaching as “self-ful”?

Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study: The philosophy of Hannah Arendt is a fruitful context in which to refine and explore this question. Arendt offers a rich typology of practical activities, distinguishing “labor” and “work” from action proper. And she puts action at the center of her theory of education. However, it is the natality and action of students that drives education, and Arendt seems to suggest that teaching itself amounts to only labor or work. The problem is that if the teacher’s core project is not actional, she will grow estranged from her own natality, and thus be incapable of recognizing and responding to the natality of her students. How can we theorize teaching as action without violating the spirit of Arendt’s compelling accounts of education and of action?

Research Design: This is a theoretical paper and uses philosophical methods such as concept clarification and development, textual analysis, and thought experiments.

Conclusions/Recommendations: Arendt’s conception of the classroom as mediating space, sheltered from full exposure to the public realm and the demands of action, is a sound one. However, this need not entail that teaching cannot be a form of action. The classroom mediates but does not entirely exclude the public. Meanwhile, action for Arendt itself involves mediation. The classroom is a theatrical space where participants may adopt roles, but politics too is theatrical for Arendt. The curriculum involves representations of aspects of the cultural inheritance, making education akin to an ongoing (cultural) constitutional convention, where making is always remaking, where the polis is again called into existence by its representatives.

To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
Purchase this Article
Purchase Human Conditions for Teaching: The Place of Pedagogy in Arendt’s Vita Activa
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 112 Number 2, 2010, p. 407-445
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 15749, Date Accessed: 6/6/2020 1:32:05 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools

Related Media

Related Articles

Related Discussion
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Chris Higgins
    University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
    E-mail Author
    CHRIS HIGGINS is assistant professor in the Department of Educational Policy Studies at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. A philosopher of education, his scholarly interests include professional ethics and teacher identity, dialogue and the teacher–student relationship, liberal learning, and professional education. His publications include “Educational Aesthetics” (Routledge Handbook of Research on the Sociocultural Foundations of Education), “Open-Mindedness in Three Dimensions” (Paideusis), “Humane Letters: Notes on the Concept of Integrity and the Meanings of Humanism” (Philosophical Studies in Education), and “From Reflective Practice to Practical Wisdom: Three Models of Liberal Teacher Education” (Philosophy of Education). His forthcoming book is entitled The Good Life of Teaching: Toward a Virtue Ethics for Teachers.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue