Welcome to Cloud2Class: Social Media in Education
by Diana L. Brandon, Alan J. Daly, Kenneth A. Frank, Christine Greenhow, Sihua Hu, Martin Rehm & Kaitlin T. Torphy - 2019
This chapter welcomes the reader to the study of social media in education. It begins with a description of the background, ranging from general use of social media in today’s society to the importance of social media in education. The study of social media in education will inevitably draw on interdisciplinary concepts and networks of relationships among ideas and people. Furthermore, social media can help researchers and educators cross current boundaries, such as the organizational boundary of the school, and the domains of teachers and leaders. Social media also reveals boundaries that have been reinforced or are emergent with social media, such as intergenerational and cross-cultural boundaries, and standard boundaries of chronology. The contributors themselves come from interdisciplinary backgrounds (all focused on education, but from computer science, technology, sociology, policy, psychology, etc.), and they consider their own agency in shaping the field of study of social media in education. This includes generating theory, raising ethical issues, and providing practical advice. After describing the organization of the yearbook, most importantly, this introduction directs readers to opportunities to engage the field (#cloud2class).
Welcome, and thank you for engaging this yearbook on the study of social media in education. Were just getting started, so there is plenty to learn and many ways to contribute. Some of you might want to pull up a chair, get comfy, and hear a bit more about what were up to (link to interviews) [Please add link or delete this reference] as well as read some of the chapters in this yearbook to get more in-depth background. You will find resources here to explore or even curate on your own. No matter how you become engaged, we hope that you will contribute by tweeting (#cloud2class), conducting new research, joining the conversation, or just reflecting on how social media is currently used in education.
BACKGROUND: SOCIAL MEDIA IN SOCIETY AND EDUCATION
In todays fast-changing world, people are increasingly turning to social media for real-time information and connection in their everyday lives. Approximately 2 billion people, or one third of the worlds population, are using social networks to find other people and resources across geographical, cultural, and economic borders. These trends are expected to grow as mobile device use and mobile social networks gain even more traction. This growing social media space will necessitate that educators, parents, and communities develop and hone new skills in identifying, discerning, and harnessing quality opportunities inhering in the technology. In essence, we need to be more explicit about the network literacy capacities that are developed in the youth and parents of today who interact in these new communities. At the same time, we need to be mindful of the network literacy of teachers, leaders, and policy makers who are continually advancing their own knowledge and that of the profession both inside and outside schools in this new social media space.
Technology will not be the sole driver of learning in the future; rather, it will be a valuable resource and part of a broad instructional repertoire that has the potential to bring in a wide variety of voices and perspectives. Therefore, to ignore its promise is to miss a significant opportunity. As each of us has explored the relationship between technology, networks, and education in our own way, it strikes us that the intersections among all three have been vastly underexplored and offer a potential high leverage point for practice, policy, and research.
As we move further into technology-enabled futures, our ability to network and leverage knowledge in collective systems will become even more important. The knowledge economy is driven by collaboration, social skills, network literacy, and the ability to harness interdependent social systems, which hold possible economic/social/political/cultural value. Better understanding of the newly evolving ideas highlighted in this yearbook provides us with the opportunity to create and grow our individual and collective ability to learn, lead, and examine processes of large-scale policy implementation. Approaching the work of educational politics and policy making as a system of relations recognizes that while the individual is important, it is the system of interactions among individuals that is equally informative and both supports and constrains access to resources.
The efforts highlighted in this yearbook are exemplars of the ongoing, innovative, disruptive power of social media and how the exclusivity of traditional media is quickly becoming outmoded, outdated, and outstripped by the rise of a new breed of communication. The mass media creation and distribution of meaning, perceptions, and beliefs are being challenged and refuted by the we enabled with devices, multiple points of contact, and a growing number of channels in which to move resources.
REVIEW OF THE WORK: BOUNDARY CROSSINGS
As we have embarked on the study of social media in education, we have been struck by how social media crosses traditional boundaries. Traditionally, teachers used resources that they created themselves or obtained from another teacher in their school or district or that were mass-produced by a textbook publisher. Now, teachers can access resources from across the world (Torphy, Hu, Liu, & Chen, in press). As teachers access these resources, they find new bases of professional community (Hashim & Carpenter, 2019, this yearbook) and upend traditional structures of power and knowledge flow (Torphy & Drake, 2019, this yearbook). As they curate these resources, teachers expand their conceptualization of instruction (Hu, Torphy, & Liu, 2018). Traditionally, there was a boundary between policy discussions and everyday practice in classrooms; however, as discussions permeate public venues such as Twitter (Daly, Supovitz, & Del Fresno, 2019, this yearbook; Rehm, Cornelissen, Daly, & Supovitz, in press; Rehm & Notten, 2016), transparent dialogue regarding policy debates encompasses stakeholder parties ranging from high-level policy makers to classroom teachers and interested citizens.
The potential of social media to facilitate connections across geographic spaces and historically entrenched hierarchies of knowledge and power (Torphy & Drake, 2019, this yearbook) also makes us aware of new boundaries that exist that have not been crossed. As teachers access virtual resource pools, they could be exposed to diverse cultural representations. However, this exposure may be siloed across resources originating from other teachers like oneself unless educators intentionally create, label, and seek out diverse cultural representations (Hu, Torphy, & Opperman, 2019, this yearbook). Similarly, social media affords intergenerational boundaries to be crossed, with a majority of adults engaging in social media as of 2016 (Statista, 2016). However, teachers do not interact in social media spaces in the same ways that adolescent learners do (Rutledge, Dennen, & Bagdy, 2019, this yearbook).
As social media afford the potential to cross boundaries, the academic world may be pushed to engage in a new medium and meet educators and learners where they are most comfortable. Traditionally, leadership was conceptualized as the behaviors or attributes of the leader that matter for a variety of outcomes. But leadership can now be conceptualized in terms of network ties that may affect flows of knowledge and diffusion of resources (Daly, Liou, Del Fresno, Rehm, & Bjorklund, 2019, this yearbook). There is already evidence that studies of social media cross boundaries between education, communication, information sciences, computer science, sociology, and so on (Rehm, Manca, Brandon, & Greenhow, 2019, this yearbook).
While the interdisciplinary nature of social media research affords great opportunities for synergy, it is also an indicator that there are currently few established homes for this work in the academy. Therefore, as this interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary work occurs, we must learn to communicate better with one another and, in doing so, value different questions, methods, and perspectives. Although these skills are generally valuable, they are even more so in the research endeavor because we often speak in different dialects, hold unique norms, and privilege different approaches. All of this is key to deep collaboration and innovation that will produce convergent knowledge.
Within this yearbook, we also cross the boundary of time. Greenhow, Cho, Dennen, and Fishman (2019, this yearbook) lay out the territory covered by previous reviews of social media and educational research to generate research directions for the terrain ahead, and Karimi, Derr, Torphy, Frank, and Tang (2019, this yearbook) provide insight into one such conversation concerning scaling research within education using machine learning approaches. Brandon (2019, this yearbook) can help others contemplate events where real-world interactions occur. All of this work is done in the spirit of pushing the conversation forward.
Some of the work in this yearbook emerges from previous studies of social networks (represented by Jeffrey Carpenter, Alan Daly, Kenneth Frank, Martin Rehm, and Jonathan Supovitz) or of education and social media (Christine Greenhow). But there are important new contributors to the field represented in this yearbook (Diana Brandon, Ayesha Hashim, Sihua Hu, Hamid Karimi, Dan Krutka, John Lane, and Kaitlin Torphy), as well as midcareer scholars (Stacey Rutledge). These scholars have brought important new perspectives, showing us where we should have seen further (Hashim & Carpenter, 2019, this yearbook; Torphy & Drake, 2019, this yearbook), or challenged more (Hu et al., 2019, this yearbook; Krutka et al., 2019, this yearbook), or helped us to get organized (Brandon, 2019, this yearbook; Lane, Boggs, Chen, & Torphy, 2019, this yearbook). Undoubtedly the junior scholars leading these articles are the future of the field.
Although the emerging scholars are the future of the field, the linkages across generations of scholars are critical to maintaining and improving scientific rigor. As we analyze social networks and social media, we must attend to basic scientific principles of good data, good measurement, and ruling out alternative explanations (Frank & Torphy, 2019, this yearbook). We must also engage in design research, seeking to improve both our educational technology designs and our knowledge base over time (Greenhow et al., 2019, this yearbook). On the other hand, traditional techniques for analysis may not be up to the task of incorporating new types of data from social media, at scale, and that represent previously unmeasured dynamics. This might be especially true as we move into BIG DATA (see Karimi et al., 2019, this yearbook; or Salganik, 2017).
IMPLICATIONS: HOW WE CAN HELP
We intend our efforts to shape this new, emerging field. As researchers, we can observe, in real time, when a policy debate is skewed by virtual actors (Daly, Supovitz, & Del Fresno, 2019, this yearbook) and where leaders go for resources (Daly, Liou, et al., 2019, this yearbook). We can observe how teachers conceptualize instruction and curate resources (Torphy et al., in press; Torphy & Drake, 2019, this yearbook). We can help teachers and teacher educators think about how to reduce the search and verification transaction costs for teachers to find valuable resources (Lane et al., 2019, this yearbook). We can raise ethical issues and the potential negative sides of using social media to recreate power differentials and polarize or stratify (Krutka et al., 2019, this yearbook). To realize the potential of social media for educational purposes, we should be skeptical, asking, does social media really change instruction and learning (Frank & Torphy, this yearbook)?
The first two articles (Daly, Supovitz, & Del Fresno, 2019, this yearbook; Rehm et al., 2019, this yearbook) provide a broad view of the field. We then move to the technical core of education including schools, leaders, teachers and students (Daly, Liou, et al., 2019, this yearbook; Hashim & Carpenter, 2019, this yearbook; Rutledge et al., 2019, this yearbook; Torphy & Drake, 2019, this yearbook). We then transition to the stuff that resides in virtual educational resource pools and flows through social media (Lane et al., 2019, this yearbook; Hu et al., this yearbook). From there, we consider challenges to the use and study of social media in education from critical perspectives (Frank & Torphy, 2019, this yearbook; Krutka et al., 2019, this yearbook), and then to a map for the future given the territory that has already been covered (Brandon, 2019, this yearbook; Karimi et al., 2019, this yearbook). You might consider reading the articles in each section as a set; they intentionally relate to one another and cross-reference each other as we attempted to look across levels of the educational endeavor. Collectively, the articles provide a basis in new empirical findings, review extant research, and provide new ways of conceptualizing the space. A Wordle of the chapters appears in Figure 1, where we observed the presence of social media, the core of schooling (e.g., teachers, students, classroom), and the virtual resource pools (e.g., networks, online, information, access).
Undoubtedly, we have missed some important contributors to what we are hoping will grow into a large and supportive community. We urgently need to better represent diversity of race, ethnicity, and culture in the work in this area. We are also aware of journalists, district administrators, and federal or state policy makers who should find the contents of this volume of interest and who might contribute their own knowledge and experiences to the study of social media in education. We also hope that grant agencies are prepared to fund work in this emerging field as the growth in this area moves the studies well out of the boutique realm. We would like to make a space for the field to coalesce, collaborate, and grow in new and unique ways (#cloud2class).
Our hope is that you will contribute. In one major way, you already have contributed by reading and sharing this yearbook with others. There are lots of ways to become a member of this growing community, including sharing your thoughts, raising questions, commenting, conducting studies, orand maybe most importantly for the work to growtweeting (#cloud2class, etc.). Introducing this work into your classroom or educational context, or even generating new ideas helps all of us to be better together. It is an open space, and open spaces call to be explored, contested, and settled, and we hope you will join this exciting group of pioneers. We hope to see you around and to check in from time to time.
Daly, A. J., Liou, Y.-H., Del Fresno, M., Rehm, M., & Bjorklund, P., Jr. (2019). Educational leadership in the Twitterverse: Social media, social networks and the new social continuum. Teachers College Record, 121(14). Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=23044
Daly, A. J., Supovitz, J., & Del Fresno, M. (2019). The social side of educational policy: How social media is changing the politics of education. Teachers College Record, 121(14). Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=23040
Frank, K. A., & Torphy, K. (2019). Social media, who cares? A dialogue between a millennial and a curmudgeon. *Authors contributed equally and are listed alphabetically. Teachers College Record, 121(14). Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=23064
Greenhow, C., Cho, V., Dennen, V., & Fishman, B. (2019). Education and social media: Research directions to guide a growing field. Teachers College Record, 121(14). Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=23039
Hashim, A. K., & Carpenter, J. P. (2019). A conceptual framework of teacher motivation for social media use. Teachers College Record, 121(14). Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=23052
Hu, S.,* Torphy, K.,* & Liu, Y. (2018, April). The influence of social media on lesson preparation and practices. Symposium paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY. *Equal first authorship
Hu, S., Torphy, K. T., & Opperman, A. (2019). Culturally relevant curriculum materials in the age of social media and curation. Teachers College Record, 121(14). Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=23043
Karimi, H., Derr, T., Torphy, K. T., Frank, K. A., & Tang, J. (2019). A roadmap for incorporating online social media in educational research. Teachers College Record, 121(14). Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=23045
Krutka, D. G., Manca, S., Galvin, S. M., Greenhow, C., Koehler, M. J., & Askari, E. (2019). Teaching against social media: Confronting problems of profit in the curriculum. Teachers College Record, 121(14). Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=23046
Lane, J. L., Boggs, B. J., Chen, Z., & Torphy, K. T. (2019). Conceptualizing virtual instructional resource enactment in an era of greater centralization, specification of quality instructional practices, and proliferation of instructional resources. Teachers College Record, 121(14). Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=23041
Rehm, M., Cornelissen, F., Daly, A., & Supovitz, J. (in press). Power to the people?! Twitter discussions on (educational) policy processes. In D. Fröhlich, M. Rehm, & B. Rienties (Eds.), Mixed methods approaches to social network analysis for learning and education. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
Rehm, M., Manca, S., Brandon, D. L., & Greenhow, C. (2019). Beyond disciplinary boundaries: Mapping educational science in the discourse on social media. Teachers College Record, 121(14). Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=23050
Rehm, M., & Notten, A. (2016). Twitter as an informal learning space for teachers!? The role of social capital in Twitter conversations among teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 215223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.015
Rutledge, S. A., Dennen, V. P., & Bagdy, L. M. (2019). Exploring adolescent social media use in a high school: Tweeting teens in a bell schedule world. Teachers College Record, 121(14). Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=23038
Salganik, M. J. (2017). Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Statista. (2016). Number of social network users worldwide from 2010 to 2021 (in billions). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/
Torphy, K. T., & Drake, C. (2019). Educators meet the Fifth Estate: The role of social media in teacher training. Teachers College Record, 121(14). Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=23066
Torphy, K., Hu, S., Liu, Y. & Chen, Z. (in press). Teachers turning to teachers: Teacherpreneurial behaviors in social media. American Journal of Education.