Subscribe Today
Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13

Principal Turnover Under No Child Left Behind Accountability Pressure

by Hajime Mitani - 2019

Background/Context: The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act was a performance-based accountability policy designed to motivate educators and administrators to change their behaviors and improve school and student outcomes. The simple logic behind this accountability policy was that they would change their behaviors to avoid sanctions. Many studies have investigated the impact of NCLB on students and teachers; however, little research has examined its impact on school principals even though they were a prime target of NCLB.

Purpose/Objective: This study fills the gap in the literature and investigates the impact of NCLB sanctions on principal turnover. It answers whether NCLB’s informal and formal sanctions influenced principal turnover behaviors and whether the influence was moderated by principal and school characteristics. It also examines patterns in principal transfers and position changes.

Research Design: This study uses longitudinal administrative data and detailed school-level assessment data obtained from Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education from 2001–02 to 2009–10. It constructs a distance variable to the adequate yearly progress threshold and uses it as a key matching variable in propensity score matching to identify comparable schools not facing NCLB sanctions. Postmatching logistic regression models identify the impact of NCLB sanctions.

Findings/Results: Although I find no evidence that informal sanction affected principal turnover, the impact is significantly moderated by principals’ job experience, Title I school status, and the percent of non-White students. The first-year NCLB sanction does not appear to have affected principal turnover. However, this finding needs to be interpreted with caution because of the way the NCLB sanction system is structured and the small sample sizes. A descriptive analysis of the relationship between the second-year NCLB sanction and beyond, and principal turnover suggests that principals tend to leave their schools when they face NCLB sanctions. Finally, I find that principals transfer away from Title I schools, transfer to schools with a smaller number of high-needs students, and take positions at district central offices, regardless of whether they face NCLB sanctions. Collectively, NCLB sanctions appear to have impacted principal turnover.

Conclusions/Recommendations: The results from this study have policy implications. They suggest that policy makers should provide professional support and adequate resources for principals, especially inexperienced principals, who work at low-performing schools and face sanctions. Moreover, policy makers should develop and embed a policy in new accountability systems that addresses inequity in the distribution of principal quality.

To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
Purchase this Article
Purchase Principal Turnover Under No Child Left Behind Accountability Pressure
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 121 Number 2, 2019, p. 1-44
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 22562, Date Accessed: 9/24/2021 1:02:29 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Hajime Mitani
    Rowan University
    E-mail Author
    HAJIME MITANI is an assistant professor of educational leadership at Rowan University. His research examines issues at the intersection of educational leadership and policy using large-scale data sets. His research interests include leadership evaluation and effectiveness, leadership skills and competencies, principal preparation programs, principal and teacher labor markets, achievement gaps, and international and comparative education. Recent publications include a coauthored article with Jason Grissom and Richard Blissett in the Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (2018) entitled “Evaluating school principals: Supervisor ratings of principal practice and principal job performance” and a single-authored article in the Educational Administration Quarterly (2018) entitled “Principals’ working conditions, job stress, and turnover behaviors under NCLB accountability pressure.”
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue