Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13

Historical Perspectives on Democratic Decision Making in Education: Paradigms, Paradoxes, and Promises

by David Gamson - 2007

“The significance of this new movement is large,” wrote Ellwood P. Cubberley in 1916, praising the growth of scientific measurement in education, “for it means nothing less than the ultimate changing of school administration from guesswork to scientific accuracy; the elimination of favoritism and politics completely from the work; . . . the substitution of professional experts for the old and successful practitioners; and the changing of school supervision from a temporary or a political job, for which little or no technical preparation need be made, to that of a highly skilled piece of professional social engineering” (pp. 325–326). As dean of the Stanford University School of Education, Cubberley was supremely confident, as were many of his contemporaries, that the empirical study of education would uncover timeless educational truths, yield new instructional and administrative practices, and permanently unite educators around a common vision of policymaking.

View Full Text in PDF Format

This article originally appeared as NSSE Yearbook Vol 106. No. 1.

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 109 Number 13, 2007, p. 15-45
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 18481, Date Accessed: 10/16/2021 7:25:00 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue