Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13

Situated Research Design and Methodological Choices in Formative Program Evaluation

by Jonathan A. Supovitz - 2013

Design-based implementation research offers the opportunity to rethink the relationships between intervention, research, and situation to better attune research and evaluation to the program development process. Using a heuristic called the intervention development curve, I describe the rough trajectory that programs typically follow as they evolve, and argue that research design considerations and methodological choices are best made in consideration of where interventions are along this curve. Further, I contend that, as programs develop, situational influences play a major role in their evolution and consequently require increased attention to design and methodological considerations. By viewing research as an integral part of a programís development, by making design and methodological choices in consideration of where programs are in their development, and by considering that the situation in which programs evolve as a potential source of change in the nature of the program itself, we alter fundamental perspectives on how research can best contribute to the steady work of building robust programs for educational improvement.

To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
Purchase this Article
Purchase Situated Research Design and Methodological Choices in Formative Program Evaluation
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.

This article originally appeared as NSSE Yearbook Vol 112. No. 2.

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 115 Number 14, 2013, p. 372-399
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 18357, Date Accessed: 10/28/2020 7:06:12 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Jonathan Supovitz
    University of Pennsylvania
    E-mail Author
    JONATHAN A. SUPOVITZ is an associate professor at the University of Pennsylvaniaís Graduate School of Education and co-director of CPRE. He is an accomplished mixed-method researcher and evaluator and has published findings from numerous educational studies and evaluations of school and district reform efforts. He has written widely on the reform implementation process, the role of leadership in school and system improvement, how data can be used for instructional and organizational inquiry, and the influence of testing policy in America. He teaches courses on the policy and instructional uses of assessment, evidence-based leadership, mixed methods research, and organizational learning. He also leads the Evidence-Based Leadership strand of the Mid-Career Leadership Program at the Graduate School of Education at the University of Pennsylvania. He received his doctorate in education policy from Harvardís Graduate School of Education; a masterís degree in public policy from Duke University; and a BA in history from the University of California at Berkeley. He has taught English and social studies in Boston, Massachusetts and Queretaro, Mexico.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue