|
|
|
Who's Qualified? Seeing Race in Color-Blind Times: Lessons from Fisher v. University of Texas by Jamel K. Donnor - 2015Using Howard Winant’s racial dualism theory, this chapter explains how race was discursively operationalized in the recent U.S. Supreme Court higher education antiracial diversity case Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin.To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below: | This article originally appeared as NSSE Yearbook Vol 114. No. 2. |
|
|
|
- Jamel Donnor
The College of William and Mary
E-mail Author
Jamel K. Donnor is an assistant professor in the School of Education at The College of William and Mary. His research interests include examining the interrelationship between educational quality, life opportunities, and life experiences according to race. His research areas are threefold: theory, policy analysis, and the education of African American males. The common threads woven within these three areas are race and inequality. He is the coeditor of The Resegregation of Schools: Race and Education in the Twenty-First Century and Scandals in College Sports: Legal, Ethical, and Policy Case Studies, both published by Routledge.
|
|
|
|
|
Email this article
Print this article
Post a Comment
