Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13

Evidence of Grade and Subject-Level Bias in Value-Added Measures

by Jessica Holloway-Libell - June 08, 2015

While value-added models (VAMs)—the statistical tools used to measure teacher effects on student achievement scores—continue to emerge throughout districts and states across the country, education scholars simultaneously recommend caution, especially in terms of the inferences that are made and/or used based on VAM outcomes. This research note investigates an unexplored feature of bias in VAM-based estimates—that which is associated with grade levels and subject areas. Findings contribute an alternative perspective regarding how we think about VAM-based bias and teacher classifications.

To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
Purchase this Article
Purchase Evidence of Grade and Subject-Level Bias in Value-Added Measures
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record, Date Published: June 08, 2015
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 17987, Date Accessed: 8/5/2021 6:15:33 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Jessica Holloway-Libell
    Kansas State University
    E-mail Author
    JESSICA HOLLOWAY-LIBELL is an assistant professor of Educational Leadership at Kansas State University. Her current research looks at market influences on teacher evaluation policies, practices and instruments. Jessica’s recent publications include Holloway-Libell, J., & Amrein-Beardsley, A. (in press). “Truths” devoid of empirical proof: Underlying assumptions surrounding value-added models (VAMs) in teacher evaluation [Commentary]. Teachers College Record; and Holloway-Libell, J., & Collins, C. (2014). VAM-based teacher evaluation policies: Ideological foundations, policy mechanisms, and implications. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue