Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements
 

“It’s Her Fault”: An Illinois School Board Fires a Guidance Counselor For Self-Publishing a Sexually Explicit Advice Book on Adult Relations


by Richard Fossey, Suzanne Eckes & Todd A. DeMitchell - September 18, 2014

An Illinois school board fired a tenured guidance counselor because he self-published a sexually explicit advice book on adult relationships. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the school board's decision on the grounds that the board reasonably believed that the book could undermine the integrity of the school counseling program.

Bryan Craig, a tenured high-school guidance counselor, self-published a short advice book on adult relationships entitled “It’s Her Fault.” As described by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, the book was an “adult” book “in every sense of the word” (Craig v. Rich Township School District 227, 2013, p. 1113). The book repeatedly discussed sexually provocative themes and used sexually explicit language.


Craig’s employer, the school board of Rich Township High School District 227, learned about Craig’s book and fired him. Craig sued the school district, the school board and several school board members, claiming that the school board retaliated against him for engaging in constitutionally protected speech. A trial court dismissed the case on the grounds that Craig’s book did not address a matter of public concern and was not entitled to constitutional protection.


On appeal, the Seventh Circuit affirmed Craig’s termination, although the reasoning differed from the trial court’s analysis. The case is an interesting one for all public school educators because it illustrates the limits of a school employee’s free-speech rights, even when speaking as a private person and not as a school district employee.


“IT’S HER FAULT”: THE FACTS OF THE CASE


Bryan Craig was a tenured guidance counselor at Rich Central High School, located in a suburb of Chicago. He also served as Rich Central’s women’s basketball coach. In 2012, Craig self-published a short book entitled “It’s Her Fault,” which consisted of a collection of his relationship advice for women.


Some of Craig’s advice was fairly run-of-the-mill. For example, he counseled women to be discrete, to be good listeners and to “‘[p]ay very close attention to content when having serious conversations with your man’” (p. 1114).


But some of Craig’s advice was far from mundane. Craig described what the Seventh Circuit delicately descried as “other portions of a woman’s anatomy” (p. 1114). He urged women to engage in sexual experimentation before marriage and to submit to their male partners’ sexual demands in order to keep them from being unfaithful. And in one part of his book, Craig “delve[d] into a comparative analysis of the female genitalia of various races which goes into an excruciating degree of graphic detail” (p. 1114).


Throughout the book, Craig made references to his school employment, thus linking his employment to his book. For example, he cited his experience with women when coaching girls’ basketball and when counseling female students. He thanked the students he counseled in the acknowledgement section of his book, and another school counselor wrote the book’s forward.


Eventually, the school board found out about Craig’s book, and the school district’s superintendent began dismissal proceedings against him. Written charges were drawn up, which stated:


(1) that publication of Craig’s book “ha[d] caused disruption, concern, distrust and confusion among members of the School District community;” (2) Craig violated the School Board’s Policy “prohibit[ing] conduct that creates “an intimidating, hostile, or offensive education environment;” and (3) “Craig failed to present [himself as] a positive role model and failed to properly comport himself in accordance with his professional obligations as a public school teacher.” (p. 1115)


In September 2012, the Rich Township school board adopted the charges against Craig and passed a resolution finding cause to discharge him. Craig then filed suit in federal court, arguing that the school board had fired him in retaliation for engaging in constitutionally protected speech.


A federal trial court dismissed Craig’s suit for failure to state a claim. In the trial court’s opinion, “It’s Her Fault” did not address a matter of public concern, being “little more than a lurid account of [Craig’s] own sexual preferences and exploits” (p. 1115). Thus, the court ruled, Craig’s book was not entitled to First Amendment protection.


SEVENTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION: SCHOOL BOARD REASONABLY ANTICIPATED THAT CRAIG’S BOOK WOULD DISRUPT THE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT


On appeal, a three-judge panel of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s ruling, although it disagreed with the trial court’s analysis. In the Seventh Circuit’s view, Craig’s book did address a matter of public concern, even though the book was of a sexually graphic nature. After all, the appellate court pointed out, “Craig’s book, though provocative, does address the structure of adult relations, an issue with which some segment of the public would be interested” (p. 1117).


Nevertheless, the Seventh Circuit concluded that the Rich Township school board had justifiable grounds for firing Craig, even though his book was entitled to constitutional protection. Citing precedents from the Seventh Circuit and guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court, the Seventh Circuit ruled that Craig’s constitutionally protected interest in publishing “It’s Her Fault,” must be weighed against his employer’s interest “in promoting efficient and effective public service” (p. 1118). In the Seventh Circuit’s view, the Rich Township school board reasonably anticipated that Craig’s book would create a disruption in the school environment, which justified the board’s termination decision.


First of all, the court noted, Craig was a guidance counselor, a position that conferred “an inordinate amount of trust and authority” upon him. In this position, Craig was obliged to “maintain a safe space for his students in order to ensure they remain willing to come to him for advice” (pp. 119-1120). If he failed to maintain a comfortable environment for his students, the court reasoned, they would not come to him for guidance and he would not be able to do his job.


In the court’s view, the school board reasonably predicted that Craig’s book would create a negative impact on the high school’s counseling program. For example, the court observed:


[W]e can easily see how female students may feel uncomfortable seeking advice from Craig given his professed inability to refrain from sexualizing females. . . . Knowing Craig’s tendency to objectify women, [the school board] could reasonably anticipate that some female students would feel uncomfortable reaching out to Craig for advice. Indeed, some students may forego receiving the school’s counseling services entirely rather than take the risk that Craig would not view them as a person but instead as an object. (p. 1120)


In summary, the court ruled, the school district’s interests “in protecting the integrity of counseling services at Rich Central dwarfed Craig’s interest in publishing ‘It’s Her Fault.’’’ Craig’s speech interest was entitled to only minimal weight when compared to the school board’s interest “in preventing a likely disruption of their guidance counseling services” (p. 1121). Thus, the school board’s decision to terminate Craig’s employment did not offend the First Amendment.


CONCLUSION


Although the Seventh Circuit upheld the discharge of a guidance counselor for writing and publishing a book as a private person, we do not view the Craig decision as a threat to the free speech rights of most public school employees. The court’s decision can be explained in great part by the fact that Craig held a particularly sensitive job at his high school—the job of guidance counselor. Indeed, the court emphasized that the school board’s interest in the integrity of its counseling program formed an important part of its analysis. (p. 1121). The court clearly saw a connection between Craig’s responsibility to provide guidance counseling to female students and his views on women as expressed in his book. The court had no difficulty upholding the school board’s decision to fire Craig based on its conclusion that the views expressed in “It’s Her Fault” could degrade Craig’s efficiency as a counselor, particularly given “ the inevitability of Craig’s book becoming common knowledge at Rich Central” (p. 1120).


Craig’s book addressed a matter of public concern, which entitled it to some constitutional protection under the First Amendment. But weighed against a school board’s interest in “preserving a safe counseling environment” (p. 1121), those interests were entitled to very little consideration.


Reference


Craig v. Rich Township High School District 227, 736 F.3d 1110 (7th Cir. 2013).




Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record, Date Published: September 18, 2014
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 17687, Date Accessed: 12/6/2021 6:11:46 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
 
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
 
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Richard Fossey
    University of Louisiana
    E-mail Author
    RICHARD FOSSEY is the Paul Burdine Endowed Professor of Education at the University of Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana.
  • Suzanne Eckes
    Indiana University
    SUZANNE ECKES is an Associate Professor at Indiana University in Bloomington, Indiana.
  • Todd DeMitchell
    University of New Hampshire
    E-mail Author
    TODD A. DEMITCHELL is a Professor in the Department of Education and the Justice Studies Program at the University of New Hampshire in Durham, New Hampshire.
 
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS