|
|
|
The Role of Psychological and Developmental Science in Efforts to Improve Teacher Quality by Sara E. Rimm-Kaufman & Bridget K. Hamre — 2010Background: Theory, methods, and knowledge gained from years of study in psychological science and human development apply to the understanding and improvement of teacher quality and, ultimately, student achievement and social and emotional outcomes. With these applications, educational research has stronger potential to make more effective and systematic contributions to the improvement of teaching in American schools. This potential can be realized by linking the scientific study of psychology and teachers’ development (social, relational, psychological, and cognitive) to teachers’ classroom behaviors (the mechanisms and processes underlying quality) and student achievement of educational and social and emotional objectives (the outputs of quality). New funds of knowledge in developmental and psychological science can serve as a basis for future research on inputs into teacher quality.
Purpose: The present article advances an interdisciplinary perspective on the factors influencing teacher quality, specifically defined as teachers’ practices and their interactions with students that can be shown to relate to student achievement. The article (1) offers a view of teacher quality focused on teacher–child interactions that serve as explanatory mechanisms in predicting children’s achievement; (2) introduces key principles of human adult development that offer insights to link developmental research on teachers to teacher quality and, ultimately, to student achievement and social and emotional outcomes; and (3) discusses two bodies of research from psychological science that illustrate the ways in which psychological principles and an overarching view of teachers as developing people may contribute to current debates about teacher quality.
Research Design: The article synthesizes research from the fields of education and psychology.
Conclusions: The article closes with recommendations for basic, developmentally oriented research on teacher quality and student achievement. To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:
|
|
|
- Sara Rimm-Kaufman
University of Virginia
E-mail Author
SARA RIMM-KAUFMAN is an associate professor of education at the University of Virginia and the Center for the Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning. She conducts research on classrooms and schools as a context for children’s development and directs the doctoral program in educational psychology-applied developmental science. Recent publications include: Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Fan, X., Chiu, Y. I., & You, W. (2007). The contribution of the Responsive Classroom approach on children’s academic achievement: Results from a three year longitudinal study. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 401–421; and Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Storm, M. D., Sawyer, B. E., Pianta, R. C., & La Paro, K. M. (2006). The Teacher Belief Q-Sort: A measure of teachers’ priorities and beliefs in relation to disciplinary practices, teaching practices, and beliefs about children. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 141–165.
- Bridget Hamre
University of Virginia
BRIDGET HAMRE is a senior research scientist at the Center for Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning at the University of Virginia. She conducts research on teacher quality and teacher professional development in early childhood. Recent publications include: Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., & Masburn, A. J. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of conflict with young students: Looking beyond problem behaviors. Social Development, 17, 115–136; and Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76, 949–967.
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Summary
Full Text in PDF Format
Email this article
Print this article
Post a Comment
