Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
My Experience
Technology - Good for Students AND Teachers
Fiddling with Indicators while using Toxic Tests
Ode to Dewey
Clearly Articulated Proposal--Thank You!
Announcements
Value assignment help online
Call For Book Proposals [Critical Storytelling Book Series]
CALL FOR PAPERS AND REGISTER for World Future Forum - Education Research!
IJEP- CALL FOR PAPERS. RESPONDING TO NEOLIBERALISM THROUGH PRAXIS AND REFLECTIONS IN THE MIDDLE OF CRISIS WHERE THE RESISTANCE AND NEW LIVES EMERGE
CALL FOR CHAPTER PROPOSALS and BOOK CHAPTERS
Research on Education in Africa, the Caribbean, and the Middle East
 

Objectifying Measures: The Dominance of High-Stakes Testing and the Politics of Schooling


reviewed by Kara S. Finnigan - November 30, 2009

coverTitle: Objectifying Measures: The Dominance of High-Stakes Testing and the Politics of Schooling
Author(s): Amanda Walker Johnson
Publisher: Temple University Press, Philadelphia
ISBN: 1592139051, Pages: 224, Year: 2009
Search for book at Amazon.com

As the debate about high-stakes accountability policies, including the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), becomes widespread, stopping to consider the statistical discourse that comprise these debates, as well as the underlying politics guiding this discourse is worthwhile.  Amanda Walker Johnson attempts to do just that in her recent book, Objectifying Measures: The Dominance of High-Stakes Testing and the Politics of Schooling.  Focusing on high-stakes testing policies in Texas, particularly those requiring students to take a standardized test to be promoted or graduate, Johnson argues that the statistical discourse around these tests “objectify” students, reducing them to numbers to manipulate.  Johnson’s purpose in writing this ethnographic study is to examine the historical and political context of the testing movement in Texas, as well as consider the forms of knowledge production that serve to reinforce the testing regime.   As an anthropologist, Johnson provides a distinct perspective on this topic.  She contends... (preview truncated at 150 words.)


To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Objectifying Measures: The Dominance of High-Stakes Testing and the Politics of Schooling
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.		$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.		$25
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.		$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record, Date Published: November 30, 2009
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 15850, Date Accessed: 4/20/2021 7:54:37 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
 
Article Tools
Email this article
Print this article
Post a Comment
Related Articles

Related Discussion
 
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Kara Finnigan
    University of Rochester
    E-mail Author
    KARA S. FINNIGAN is an Assistant Professor of Educational Policy at the University of Rochester's Warner School of Education. Her current research focuses on schools and districts under accountability policy sanctions and interdistrict choice.
 
Member Center
Welcome!
Sign-in
Submit My Work
TCR @ Your Library
Book Reviews @ Your Library
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS
 
Add TC Record RSS feeds to your site
Copyright 2021 Teachers College, Columbia University. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Copyright Agreement