Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13

So NOT Amazing! Teach For America Corps Members’ Evaluation of the First Semester of Their Teacher Preparation Program

by Heather Carter, Audrey Amrein-Beardsley & Cory Cooper Hansen - 2011

Background: Much of the research related to Teach For America (TFA) is related to the concerns surrounding whether such teachers should assume primary teaching responsibility and whether alternatively certified teachers are effective in the classroom. This research study takes a different approach and moves the conversation into a new domain of evaluating the coursework that TFA teachers undertake to meet state-mandated certification requirements. Based on initial course evaluations at a college of education, TFA students rated their university courses and instructors more critically than did non-TFA students.

Purpose of Study: The purposes of this study were (1) to explore the aforementioned differences in quality ratings of courses and instructors and (2) to examine what items on the student evaluation instrument could be used to identify salient constructs that are most necessary to meet the needs of TFA students.

Setting: This research was conducted at a college of education at a Research I university involved with a TFA partnership through which TFA students earn master’s and certification while teaching in high-needs schools.

Participants: Participants in this study were TFA students who were teaching on an alternative teaching certificate, as compared with traditional students who were enrolled in the same methods courses with the same instructors. Both sets of students were enrolled in their first year of their teacher preparation program.

Research Design: The researchers analyzed the numerical differences between student evaluation scores posted for the same instructors by different groups of students (TFA and traditional students enrolled in the same methods coursework). The researchers also analyzed survey (Likert-type and open-ended) data to evidence and explain differences.

Findings/Results: (1) TFA students did in fact rate their courses and instructors significantly lower than did their non-TFA peers; (2) TFA students, as practicing teachers in charge of real-time classrooms, were more critical consumers, critical in the sense that they needed—or, more appropriately, felt that they needed—coursework that provided just-in-time knowledge; and (3) TFA students did not feel as if they were treated like master’s students. They wanted instructors who modeled practical teaching strategies and did not dumb down course activities, many of which they believed were irrelevant and a waste of time given their immediate needs.

Conclusions/Recommendations: Issues related to certification coursework are highlighted, and included are specific and immediate course improvement recommendations and a call to reexamine educational policies related to alternative teacher certification.

To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
Purchase this Article
Purchase So NOT Amazing! Teach For America Corps Members’ Evaluation of the First Semester of Their Teacher Preparation Program
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 113 Number 5, 2011, p. 861-894
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 15832, Date Accessed: 7/24/2021 11:09:56 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Heather Carter
    Arizona State University
    HEATHER CARTER is the director of Community Engagement and Communications for the College of Teacher Education and Leadership at Arizona State University. In this role, she has worked extensively with ASU and its Teach For America Partnership specifically, as well as other organizations and nonprofits interested in teacher certification and professional development. Her research interests include alternative paths to certification and teachers’ use of social networking sites. Two recent publications are: Carter, H. L., Foulger, T. S., & Ewbank. A. D. (2008). Have you Googled your teacher lately? Teachers’ use of social networking sites. Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 681–685; and Ewbank, A. D., Kay, A. G., Foulger, T. S., & Carter, H. L. (in press). Conceptualizing codes of conduct in social networking communities. In H. Yang & S. Yuen (Eds.), Collective intelligence and e-learning 2.0: Implications of web-based communities and networking. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Audrey Amrein-Beardsley
    Arizona State University
    E-mail Author
    AUDREY AMREIN-BEARDSLEY is currently an assistant professor in the College of Teacher Education and Leadership at Arizona State University. Her research interests include educational policy, high-stakes tests, and aspects of teacher quality and teacher education. She has been nationally recognized for her research in these areas. Two recent publications are: Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2008, March). Methodological concerns about the Education Value-Added Assessment System (EVAAS). Educational Researcher, 37(2), 65–75; and Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2007, September). Recruiting expert teachers into hard-to-staff schools: Recovering student achievement one-step at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(1).
  • Cory Hansen
    Arizona State University
    CORY COOPER HANSEN is an associate professor in the College of Teacher Education and Leadership at Arizona State University. Her research interests include best practice in literacy instruction at all levels, including effective integration of technology. Her scholarship and teaching have received academic awards and honors. Two recent publications are: Hansen, C. C. (2008). Observing technology enhanced literacy learning. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2). Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/25334; and Hansen, C. C. (2008). Integrating technology in early childhood literacy instruction. In A. T. Columbus & R. M. McBride (Eds.), New research on early childhood education (pp. 83–113). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue