Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13

Literacy Makeover: Educational Research and the Public Interest on Prime Time

by Adam Lefstein - 2008

Background/Context: Literacy education has always been hotly contested, and in England the debate has recently intensified in controversies over synthetic phonics teaching and the National Literacy Strategy. This article brings together four theoretical and policy contexts in studying this debate: (1) the long-standing and on-going “reading wars”; (2) theories of deliberative democracy, and the particular problems of how the mass media facilitate and/or suppress public discourse and the participation of academic experts in the public sphere; (3) the affordances and constraints of television news reporting, and in particular, the emergence of the makeover reality television genre as a model for current affairs reporting; and (4) the “evidence-based policy” movement in educational research.

Purpose/Questions: This article examines a prominent media event—the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) television program Newsnight’s reports on synthetic phonics teaching—to reflect on the relationship between educational research, the media, and the treatment of educational problems in the public sphere. I ask: How are educational problems represented in the mass media? How do and should academic researchers participate in public debates about these problems?

Research Design: This interpretive study is based primarily on critical analysis of three news reports and was informed by rhetorical criticism, genre analysis, ethnographic research of the educational program represented, and theoretical concerns about the interaction of research, the mass media, and the public sphere. Key participants in the media event were also interviewed.

Findings: The prestigious news program has poorly served public debate by narrowing the problem of educational improvement to a question of teaching method; by promoting a “makeover” approach to school reform; and by casting the issue in the inherited yet inadequate terms of the traditional “reading wars” frame. The two educational researchers appearing on the program adopted different rhetorical strategies. One invoked his academic authority and acted as an epistemological gatekeeper. The second, who was deemed to be more successful, addressed viewers as consumers of educational goods and couched her academic concerns in everyday language.

Conclusions: The case study has implications for the way that educational researchers communicate their ideas to the general public. In particular, it raises questions about the desirability and likely effectiveness of the currently popular strategy to maximize research influence through the promotion of “evidence-based” policy.

To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
Purchase this Article
Purchase Literacy Makeover: Educational Research and the Public Interest on Prime Time
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 110 Number 5, 2008, p. 1115-1146
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 13450, Date Accessed: 7/25/2021 8:13:13 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Adam Lefstein
    Oxford University Department of Educational Studies
    E-mail Author
    ADAM LEFSTEIN is Academic Fellow in Pedagogy and Classroom Interaction at the Oxford University Department of Educational Studies. His research interests include classroom interaction and the problem of change, teacher enactment of curricular materials, dialogue in schools, hermeneutics and reading comprehension, grammar teaching, and media coverage of literacy education. Recent publications include “Thinking About the Technical and the Personal in Teaching” in Cambridge Journal of Education (2005) and “Dialogue in Schools: Toward a Pragmatic Approach” (Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies, King’s College London, 2006).
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue