Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13

Accountability, California Style: Counting or Accounting?

by Michael Russell, Jennifer Higgins & Anastasia Raczek - 2004

Across the nation and at nearly all levels of our educational system, efforts to hold schools accountable for student learning dominate strategies for improving the quality of education. At both the national and state level, student testing stands at the center of educational accountability programs, such that schools are effectively held accountability for increases in student test scores. This working definition of accountability contrasts sharply with the formal definition of accountability in which those discharged with duties are expected to provide an account—that is, a description and an explanation—of their duties and conduct and to assist in determining whether said conduct was responsible. This article focuses specifically on the accountability system introduced in California in 1999 and identifies several shortcomings of test-based accountability systems. These shortcomings fall into two broad categories: unrealistic expectations established by the system and failure to identify why schools succeed or fail to meet test-based goals. Based on shortcomings identified in California, as well as limitations of test-based accountability itself, several recommendations for an improved accountability system are offered. Chief among these recommendations is that notions of accountability be expanded such that accountability becomes a two-way process in which all levels from the classroom up to the state should be asked to account for their practices and the impact those practices have on students and their learning.

To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
Purchase this Article
Purchase Accountability, California Style: Counting or Accounting?
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 106 Number 11, 2004, p. 2102-2107
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 12760, Date Accessed: 4/22/2021 1:08:47 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Michael Russell
    Boston College
    E-mail Author
    MICHAEL RUSSELL is an assistant professor in the Lynch School of Education and a senior research associate for the Center for the Study of Testing Evaluation and Educational Policy. His research interests focus on the intersection of accountability, testing, and technology.
  • Jennifer Higgins
    Boston College
    JENNIFER HIGGINS is a research associate in the Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative at Boston College. Her research interests focus on improving teaching, learning, and assessment through applications of technology.
  • Anastasia Raczek
    Quality Metric Incorporated
    ANASTASIA RACZEK is a research scientist at Quality Metric Incorporated. Her research interests include equity issues associated with largescale educational assessment, computer adaptive assessment, and the measurement of children’s health-related quality of life.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue