Topics

AdministrationViolenceSupervisionLeadership

Adult EducationCorp. Training and Continuing Ed.LiteracyTransformative Learning

Assessment & EvaluationProgram EvaluationAlternative AssessmentGradingStandardized Testing

Social ContextHistory of SchoolingPhilosophyUrban EducationEconomics and School-to-workRural EducationSociology of EducationWar and EducationPost-Industrial Education

CounselingSecondary SchoolsCollege Advising

CurriculumControlArtsSocial StudiesHealth and NutritionLanguage ArtsMathematicsPeace StudiesScience

DiversityRace and EthnicityAt-Risk StudentsSpecial NeedsGender and Sexuality

Early Childhood EducationPre-School and Child CareEarly Childhood Development

Higher EducationAdmissions and TuitionFacultyPolicyStudent and Community Life

International EducationComparative EducationEducational Development

LearningCognitionParental InfluenceEducational Psychology

PolicyReformCharters & VouchersHigh-Stakes TestingStandardsAthletes and AcademicsDropoutsIndependent SchoolsPhilanthropyPoliticsReligionTracking

Research MethodsQualitative MethodsSurvey ResearchExperimental ResearchLibrariesWriting for Publication

Teacher EducationProfessional DevelopmentSchools of EducationStudent Teaching

TeachingTeaching ProfessionSupply and DemandWorking Conditions

TechnologyTechnology in the ClassroomDistance LearningTechnology EducationPublishing and CommunicationOnline Publishing

IntersectionsPolicy and Teaching Practice

Discussion
Technology - Good for Students AND Teachers Fiddling with Indicators while using Toxic Tests Ode to Dewey Clearly Articulated Proposal--Thank You! VAM Sham BAM
more >>

Announcements

How Can I Get OFF this list?

International Conference - Education and Social Science

International Society for the Social Studies Annual Conference

Call for Chapter Proposals

International Journal of Educational Policies

Call for papers on Institutional Data/Research

Call for Reviewers (JEC)

make a post | more >>

Can NCLB Close Achievement Gaps?

by David J. Armor � August 16, 2006

In this commentary I argue that there are no demonstrable educational methods that can produce full proficiency for all students by 2014, and until there are the Department of Education should adopt a growth model that does not have a date-certain requirement to attain full proficiency for all groups.

To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record, Date Published: August 16, 2006
http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 12667, Date Accessed: 10/22/2017 1:35:11 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review

Article Tools
Email this article Print this article Post a Comment

Related Media

Related Discussion
Do We Really Want To Close the Achievement Gap? It's in the instruction, not in the "growth model."

Post a Comment \| Read All

About the Author
David Armor George Mason University E-mail Author DAVID J. ARMOR is professor of public policy at George Mason University.

Member Center
	Welcome! Sign-in Submit My Work TCR @ Your Library Book Reviews @ Your Library

In Print

This Month's Issue
Back Issues: