|
|
|
In Peer Review, It's Time to Stop Thinking Statistically About Qualitative Research
by Jim Vander Putten - July 24, 2006
Explicit criteria have been widely published to accurately evaluate both quantitative and qualitative research. Peer review that uses one paradigm on the basis of the other, however, is inappropriate at best, raises ethical questions in regard to fairness, and can have dire consequences for faculty careers.
To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:
|
|
|
|
- Jim Vander Putten
University of Arkansas-Little Rock
E-mail Author
JIM VANDER PUTTEN is an associate professor of Higher Education in the Department of Educational Leadership and Chair of the Institutional Review Board at the University of Arkansas-Little Rock. He coordinates the Faculty Development concentration in the doctoral program in Higher Education, and his research interests include faculty from working-class backgrounds, faculty and staff perceptions of the higher education work environment, and the organizational culture and climate for the responsible conduct of human participants research.
|
|
|
|
|
Email this article
Print this article
Post a Comment
