Subscribe Today
Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13

Standards Reform in High-Poverty Schools: Managing Conflict and Building Capacity

reviewed by Tonya R. Moon - 2004

coverTitle: Standards Reform in High-Poverty Schools: Managing Conflict and Building Capacity
Author(s): Carol A. Barnes
Publisher: Teachers College Press, New York
ISBN: 0807742627, Pages: 159, Year: 2002
Search for book at Amazon.com

This book is part of the series on school reform and is organized into seven chapters with a forward by David K. Cohen. The intent of the book according to the author is to “illustrate something about the nature of education reform in America using the experience of people in schools as they struggled to both maintain and transform their professional responsibilities” (p. xiii). The book clearly communicates that change is difficult at best and requires the support of all stakeholders in order to make schools a better place for both our students and those responsible for their education.

The book is situated in one high-poverty elementary school (

Mission Elementary School ) in southern California and focuses on the attempts of school staff to reconcile often times competing state and federal educational initiatives. For those interested in the improvement of high-poverty schools and the consequences for these schools of George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law, this book serves as an excellent resource on the complexity of such mandated initiatives in this type of school environment.

The book is based on Barnes’ observations and interviews with the Mission school staff over a two-year period and focuses specifically on six individuals in the school: a first-grade bilingual teacher, a second-grade teacher, two third-grade teachers, a bilingual Title I teacher, and the school’s principal. Contained in each section of the book are vignettes and actual interview transcripts that highlight the experiences of these six individuals in attempting to leave no child behind.

Chapter 1 of the book describes Mission Elementary in the first year of Barnes’ research and in particular focuses on the school and its staff prior to their decision to restructure to address low test scores and California’s curriculum and Title I reform efforts. Barnes helps the reader develop a clear understanding of how attempts to reduce inequality and raise academic expectations, while seemingly laudable endeavors, can create paradoxical circumstances that come from mixing new ideas with traditional conceptions of school.

Chapter 2 focuses on the school level and examines the influences of both policy or program goals and a principal’s professional identify. The chapter identifies and describes how lack of opportunities to “relearn” conceptions of leading, teaching, and learning interferes with the ability of school staff to transform reform ideas into actual practice.

Chapters 3 and 4 illustrate variations on the themes of conflict and capacity by focusing on classrooms and the interactions between students and Title I teachers. Chapter 3 highlights the realities of managing conflicting commitments in classrooms, and in particular, a second-grade classroom and how teachers’ professional identifies contribute to the instructional program. Chapter 4 is continuation of chapter 3 with the Title I students entering third grade with teachers who have very different professional identifies and understanding of policy goals. The teachers’ differing opinions and disagreements are as Barnes indicates “a microcosm for some of the national, state, and historical arguments about educating American children” (p.19). The chapter highlights the obstacles that reforms face: deeply engrained practices of teachers, limited social resources, and mixed messages from leadership.

Chapters 5 and 6 continue the story on the school, classrooms, and the Title I students after the implementation of a newly, restructured school improvement plan. Chapter 5 presents the social conflicts that emerge as staff members begin to collaborate closely on goals and in particular highlights that the more teachers clarified the meaning of the goals, the more they disagreed over what to do about them. Their work also began to result in a narrower definition of achievement, something that was in direct conflict with their curriculum reforms. Chapter 6 focuses on the tensions that result between levels of reform activities and the gains and losses of such tensions. For example, “improvement of achievement” for Title I students was conceptualized as increasing the speed and accuracy of sight words or pieces of text (one might consider a “gain”). But for this type instruction, students were pulled out of the classroom. Some research indicates that this is a loss for this group of students in terms of educating disadvantaged students.

Chapter 7, the concluding chapter, synthesizes the macro and micro themes explored throughout the book, identifies problems with reforms in general, and offers possibilities for sustaining reform efforts.

Overall the book is an in-depth, reality situated examination of an attempt to implement policy and those responsible for the implementation–principals and teachers. The book is an excellent story on how the capacity to undertake reform efforts successfully is most likely lacking in the schools that the reforms are intended to improve in the first place. It highlights the importance of conversations among reform designers, policy planners, school and district leaders, and teachers rather than the typical didactic, one-sided approach is that commonly seen across American educational systems.

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 106 Number 5, 2004, p. 0-0
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 11214, Date Accessed: 10/17/2021 12:38:41 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Tonya Moon
    University of Virginia, Curry School of Education
    E-mail Author
    TONYA R. MOON is an assistant professor in the Curry School of Education at the University of Virginia and a principal investigator for the National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. Her research focuses on the area of accountability initiatives and their influences on classroom practices.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue