by Richard MünchThis article is focused on the conflicting ideas of education behind the PISA study and the German school system. It addresses the changes taking place in the German school system enforced by compliance with the educational standards set by the PISA context.
by David LabareePISA has come up with an ingenious solution to the problem of how to measure student achievement across national school systems with different curricula. Instead of measuring how well students learn what they are taught in each system, it measures a set of economically useful skills that no one teaches. This article explores PISA as one type of educational accountability system, based on how well students demonstrate mastery of particular cognitive skills, and compares it with the current state-level accountability systems in the United States, which are based on how well students demonstrate mastery of the formal curriculum.
by Daniel TröhlerThis paper analyzes the political strategies of the early OECD stakeholders in transforming schooling from a cultural to a technological system. In doing so it focuses on the specific rhetoric these stakeholders used and how they were in need of standardizing different existing patterns of thoughts or institutional behaviors in the member countries.
by Heinz-Dieter MeyerThe article analyzes the ideological and political context and mechanisms which have allowed OECD to become a major unchecked power in global educational policy making.
by Heinz-Dieter Meyer, Daniel Tröhler, David F. Labaree & Ethan L. HuttEpitomized by the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the U.S. government’s Race to the Top, “accountability” is becoming a pervasive normalizing discourse, legitimizing historic shifts from viewing education as a social and cultural to an economic project engendering usable skills and “competences.” The purpose of this special issue is to provide context and perspective on these momentous shifts. The papers point to historic antecedents, highlight core ideas, and identify changes in the balance of power between domestic and global policy makers.
by Ethan HuttThis paper examines the history and development of the GED in order to investigate the allure, promise, and pitfalls of the idea of contextless assessment and accountability. In doing so, this paper reveals the importance of quantification as a means of creating useful abstractions as well as the inherent danger of the perceived certainty of these kinds of metrics. The U.S. experience with the GED offers important lessons and insights in a world where PISA continues the reign of contextless, test-based accountability systems.
by Harry Leonardatos & Katie ZahediWritten by New York public school principals, Harry Leonardatos and Katie Zahedi, this article shares a shop-floor view of the impact of Race to the Top on New York Public Schools. The New York State Regents Reform Agenda involves mandated compliance with the federal legislation within Race to the Top (RTTT). Requirements related to an increase in student testing and the coupling of teacher evaluations to students’ scores on state tests is at cause in the deterioration the quality of public education in New York State. Imposed political directives are shown to have a role in creating confusion through untested policies, engendering a culture of distrust, and diverting money from sound educational practice that are dismantling public schools in favor of market models.