Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements
You Are Here: Read an Article > View All Posts for the Article > Read a Post
 
Read a Post for Learning to Lead: What Gets Taught in Principal-Preparation Programs
 
Reply to this Post
 

Research Bias

Posted By: James Lee on November 30, 2007
 
This is the research one would expect from the American Enterprise Institute, an arm of the Bush administration, an advocate of one-dimensional standardized testing accountability, and an enemy of so-called "progressive" education (a term used deliberately to conjure up images of classrooms in which anything goes and kids "do their own thing").

Schools require leadership models with a different approach than the business models these authors recommend, but their conservative bias favors a top-down, punitive accountability model that is starved of any real understanding of how kids learn and how to best assess such learning.

Yes, the bias of much of what educational leaders read in administrative courses favors a progressive approach. That's because the old industrial or corporate model is clearly bankrupt. Providing school leaders with a "balanced" approach is to advocate for nothing. Actually, what our authors really want is their values, not a balance. And it's not helpful to have this agenda thinly veiled behind the research they have done.

In the end, it comes down to what values one holds to, and the American Enterprise Institute will always be on the far right of the spectrum. As a voice to be considered, that's OK, but it's out of step with what educators know is best for kids.
Thread Hierarchy
 Research Bias by James Lee on November 30, 2007
    Member Center
    In Print
    This Month's Issue

    Submit
    EMAIL

    Twitter

    RSS