Who's Qualified? Seeing Race in Color-Blind Times: Lessons from Fisher v. University of Texas


by Jamel K. Donnor ó 2015

Using Howard Winantís racial dualism theory, this chapter explains how race was discursively operationalized in the recent U.S. Supreme Court higher education antiracial diversity case Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin.


To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Who's Qualified? Seeing Race in Color-Blind Times: Lessons from Fisher v. University of Texas
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


This article originally appeared as NSSE Yearbook Vol 114. No. 2.


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 117 Number 14, 2015, p. 185-203
http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 18342, Date Accessed: 12/14/2017 11:29:35 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review