Does the Supreme Court Ruling on Vouchers in Cleveland Really Matter for Education Reform?
by Clive Belfield & Henry M. Levin — July 01, 2002
In this commentary we review the Supreme Court opinion of June 2002 in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris. In the first section, we offer an interpretation of the ruling in terms of four evaluative criteria: freedom of choice, productive efficiency, equity, and social cohesion. Unsurprisingly, the opinion strongly emphasized parental freedom of choice over the other criteria. In the second section, we consider whether the Supreme Court ruling represents a major victory for voucher advocates and whether it will have a substantial impact on improving America's schools. Our discussion takes a rather skeptical position, and we offer eight justifications for such a view.
To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below: