Reforming Teacher Preparation and Licensing: What Is the Evidence?


by Dale Ballou & Michael Podgursky — 2000

Using professional self-regulation in medicine as a model, the National Commission for Teaching and America’s Future has proposed sweeping changes in the way teachers are trained and licensed. The commission claims that these reforms are well-grounded in a strong base of research. However, a balanced reading of the literature finds far less support for these reforms than the commission has claimed. In many cases the research is misrepresented. Since the commission’s proposals would transfer considerable regulatory power out of the public domain to private education organizations, the burden of proof is on the commission to make a convincing case that such changes promote the welfare of the public and not just the interest of the profession. This burden has not been met.


To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Reforming Teacher Preparation and Licensing: What Is the Evidence?
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 102 Number 1, 2000, p. 5-27
http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 10434, Date Accessed: 12/12/2017 4:26:45 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review