Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements
You Are Here: Discussion > View Posts for the Philosophy Topic > Read a Post
 
Read a Post
 
Reply to this Post
 

On Post-modernism and Proctology

Posted By: Jeff McCullers on August 15, 2002
 
I completely and enthusiastically agree with Mike Sacken that the language of modern and post-modern philosophy is remarkably unpleasant--and probably silly. I have sometimes read an article and then not been able to identify the topic with a sufficient degree of confidence, much less the conclusions.

Having said that, though, I can't go on to dismiss the whole enterprise as not being worth the trouble. When I do read something clear and profound (say, something written by Mortimer J. Adler), then I am rewarded many times over what effort I may have put into it. Most important, reading that kind of work actually improves teaching practice.

And yes--to follow up on Mike Sacken's memorable proctological metaphor--the "examined life" is a fine thing, but we can limit our deep probing to our minds, our understanding, and our practice!
Thread Hierarchy
 The Primacy Paradox by Jeff McCullers on April 26, 2002
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS