Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements
You Are Here: Read an Article > View All Posts for the Article > Read a Post
 
Read a Post for The Use of Qualitative Methods in Large-Scale Evaluation: Improving the Quality of the Evaluation and the Meaningfulness of the Findings
 
Reply to this Post
 

Qualitative Research "by the numbers."

Posted By: Dick Schutz on August 8, 2006
 
The operative sentence is “the Waterford program had no added benefit for students in treatment classrooms.” That finding could have been reached by an analysis of the Waterford product/protocol and confirmed by a much smaller and shorter-tem study than was involved here. Although the investigators made recommendations to the District after the first year, there was no follow-up in subsequent years as to the extent to which the recommendations were implemented or the benefits/lack thereof for students. Nor was there any follow-up that showed any benefit from the recommendations based on the finding that “the quality of pedagogy and Open Court implementation in both treatment and comparison classrooms was low.”

Meanwhile, no changes have been made in other the Waterford or the Open Court product/protocols. Both continue to claim that they are “research-based.” Wonder why there’s a “reading problem?”

Dick Schutz
3RsPlus@usinter.net
Thread Hierarchy
 Qualitative Research "by the numbers." by Dick Schutz on August 8, 2006
    Member Center
    In Print
    This Month's Issue

    Submit
    EMAIL

    Twitter

    RSS