Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Assessment & Evaluation

by Jacob Neumann — 2016
This article analyzes the effects of mandated accountability testing, teachers' knowledge and beliefs, and teachers' milieu on the work of four social studies teachers in one middle school in Texas. The article argues that more comprehensive and holistic research efforts are needed for researches to be able to more fully understand and communicate to readers the combination of factors that impact teachers' work.

by Stuart Yeh — 2015
The achievement gap may be explained as a consequence of the conventional structure of schooling and the failure to individualize task difficulty and provide performance feedback in a way that is necessary to ensure that all students experience mastery.

by Marty Pollio & Craig Hochbein — 2015
This study utilizes a non-equivalent control group design and quantitative analyses to compare the association between classroom grades and standardized test scores.

by Anne Traynor & Allison Chapman — 2015
To allay public concerns that state exit examination mandates might unfairly hinder some students’ educational attainment prospects, most states with exam requirements offer alternative routes to graduation for all students. This study probes the relationship between various exam difficulty-alternative route policy combinations and the subsequent attainment outcomes of tenth-graders.

by Kitae Sohn — 2015
This article demonstrates that the carryover effects of STAR’s small classes are not robust; the effects are driven mostly by a small number of STAR schools.

by Robert Mislevy — 2014
This article explains the idea of a neopragmatic postmodernist test theory and offers some thoughts about what changing notions concerning the nature of and meanings assigned to knowledge imply for educational assessment, present and future. Reprinted with permission from Transitions in Work and Learning: Implications for Assessment, 1997, by the National Academy of Sciences, Courtesy of the National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

by Kenneth Gergen & Ezekiel Dixon-Román — 2014
In the present offering we challenge the presumption that the educational testing of students provides objective information about such students. This presumption largely rests on an empiricist account of science. In light of mounting criticism, however, empiricist foundationalism has given way to a social epistemology. From this standpoint, empirical data are only objective for those who share assumptions and values that are themselves without foundations. Thus, the major questions to be raised about testing are not in terms of whether test results supply the truth about those who are evaluated, but concern the utility of the tests for the full range of stakeholders. Who gains and loses as a result of testing practices, and in what ways? In the present offering we focus in particular on a range of adverse consequences. We first note the neoliberalist and individualist ideologies carried by current testing practices. We then discuss the impact on societal well-being, including the fostering of social division and distrust, the creation of hierarchies of worth, and the diminution of pluralism. We turn then to the impact of testing on the educational system, including the sacrifice of curriculum and pedagogy for the production of higher test scores, and the diminution of teacher motivation and engagement. Finally, in terms of community, there is a disregard for local needs and values, a loss in student motivation, and an increase in family tensions. We complete the paper with a discussion of possible alternatives to current testing practices, and recommendations for future policies.

by Joanna Gorin — 2014
This paper considers future educational assessment in terms of principles of evidential reasoning, focusing the discussion on the changes to the claims our assessments must support, the types of evidence needed to support these claims, and the statistical tools available to evaluate our evidence vis-à-vis the claims. An expanded view of assessment is advanced in which assessments based on multiple evidence sources from contextually rich situated learning environments, including unconventional data regarding human competencies, improve our ability to make valid inferences and decisions all education stakeholders.

by Brent Duckor & Daniel Perlstein — 2014
Educational researchers and policymakers have often lamented the failure of teachers to implement what they consider to be technically sound assessment procedures. Through a case study of New York City’s Central Park East Secondary School (CPESS), in the years when it served as a model for progressive American school reform, Duckor and Perlstein demonstrate the usefulness of an alternative to reliance of the technical characteristics of standardized tests for constructing and judging assessments: teachers’ self-conscious and reasoned articulation of their approaches to learning and assessment. They conclude that when teachers are given opportunities for genuine, shared reflection on teaching and learning and classroom practices are tied to this understanding, fidelity to what they call the logic of assessment offers a more promising framework for the improvement of schooling than current forms of high-stakes, standardized accountability. Thus, instead of expecting teachers to rely on data from standardized assessments or replicate features of standardized testing in their own assessment practices, researchers, policymakers and teacher educators should promote fidelity to the broader logic of assessment.

by Vincent Cho & Jeffrey Wayman — 2014
Drawing upon the concept of interpretive flexibility, this study illuminates some of the sensemaking processes around teachers’ uses of data and computer data systems. Accordingly, it provides recommendations regarding how researchers, school, and district leaders might be more attentive to the “people problems” around data system implementation.

by Alyson Lavigne, Thomas Good & Ronald Marx — 2014

by Thomas Good — 2014
In this article, the author describes the history of classroom research and notes that, despite potential for present day application, many of those who currently develop observational systems for evaluating teachers appear to be unaware of this literature. The author describes what we know about effective teaching, the limits of using this information, and the need for identifying new important outcomes of schooling that can be used in teacher evaluation.

by Spyros Konstantopoulos — 2014
This paper reviews the literature on teacher effects and focuses on value-added measures and their use in evaluating teachers. Suggestions about the use of value-added measures and about the future of teacher effects research are provided.

by Clarin Collins & Audrey Amrein-Beardsley — 2014
In this study, the researchers surveyed all 50 states and the District of Columbia to provide an inclusive national growth and value-added model overview.

by Corinne Herlihy, Ezra Karger, Cynthia Pollard, Heather Hill, Matthew Kraft, Megan Williams & Sarah Howard — 2014
This paper explores how state education officials and their district and local partners plan to implement and evaluate their teacher evaluation systems, focusing in particular on states’ efforts to investigate the reliability and validity of scores emerging from the observational component of these systems.

by Alyson Lavigne — 2014
This article discusses the intended and unintended consequences of high-stakes teacher evaluation. The potential for high-stakes teacher evaluation to meet the intended outcome of a better teacher workforce and improved student achievement is assessed, and the costs of doing so.

by Rick Ginsberg & Neal Kingston — 2014
This study examines accountability in teacher education in an era of testing. It compares how multiple professions evaluate program outcomes and identifies concerns with overemphasis on value-added models as the basis for assessing the impact of teacher preparation program graduates. Suggestions are offered for possible alternative paths.

by Ronald Marx — 2014
This article discusses the papers in the special issue of Teachers College Record addressing broad themes of reliability and validity that raise cautions regarding the usefulness of recent approaches to high-stakes evaluation of educators. Implications are drawn for the long-term health of the teacher labor market.

by Diane Ravitch — 2014
Foreword to the special issue on High-Stakes Teacher Evaluation.

by Rachael Gabriel & Jessica Lester — 2013
In the fairytale of US public education reform, the root of all evil has presumably been identified: the dragons of ineffectiveness. In this fairytale, The LA Times, a newspaper team of investigative reporters, hired statisticians, and other columnists have rode in on the back of Value-Added Measurement. In this paper, we present findings from a discourse analysis study examining what we have come to name a policy narrative centered on teacher evaluation and effectiveness. We conducted an analysis of 52 articles published between 2009 and 2011 that were from or related to a series on Value-Added Measurement initially published in 2010 by The LA Times. We sought to understand the ways in which discourse choices worked to construct a certain version of policy issues related to teacher quality, positioning some individuals and even national groups on one side of a polarized debate. We have given particular attention to the ways in which the media discourse functioned to politicize and (over)simplify issues related to educational policy and teacher evaluation.

by Jonathan Supovitz — 2013
Design-based implementation research offers the opportunity to rethink the relationships between intervention, research, and situation to better attune research and evaluation to the program development process. Using a heuristic called the intervention development curve, I describe the rough trajectory that programs typically follow as they evolve, and argue that research design considerations and methodological choices are best made in consideration of where interventions are along this curve. Further, I contend that, as programs develop, situational influences play a major role in their evolution and consequently require increased attention to design and methodological considerations. By viewing research as an integral part of a program’s development, by making design and methodological choices in consideration of where programs are in their development, and by considering that the situation in which programs evolve as a potential source of change in the nature of the program itself, we alter fundamental perspectives on how research can best contribute to the steady work of building robust programs for educational improvement.

by Eva Baker — 2013
This article approaches the evolving concept of validity of assessments, moving from the scholarship of the past, to the constraints and demands of the present. The use of technology and globalization are raised as challenges to future approaches to validity.

by Leo Casey — 2013
This article provides an analysis of the recent publication of the value-added measurements found in the Teacher Data Reports of the New York City Department of Education.

by David Steiner — 2013
This article considers the value of the national move toward value-added measures and our current fascination with objective measurements – a fascination that stems from our collective distrust of our teachers and ourselves, and our reluctance to make judgments about the substantive narratives we teach students.

by Kevin Welner — 2013
Assessment use has switched from measurement tools to policy levers. Meaning is created by use, and the intense push for test-based accountability and teacher evaluation policies in the U.S. has fundamentally changed the nature of test use. The core meaning of testing has accordingly been qualitatively changed, and serious policy attention to issues of consequential validity counsels against use of tests to drive policy unless, and until, the results that process itself have been validated for their furtherance of recognized goals.

by Lorrie Shepard — 2013
This article, an afterword to the special issue, considers the multiple purposes of test validity.

by Bethany Rogers & Megan Blumenreich — 2013
This research uses oral history narratives to examine the professional choices and trajectories of Teach for America participants over a twenty-year period, attending especially to individuals’ perceptions of their urban teaching experiences, their beliefs, and their reasons for staying in or leaving the urban classroom, with the aim of better understanding the experiences of such teachers and the implications for staffing urban schools.

by Kevin Dougherty, Rebecca Natow, Rachel Bork, Sosanya Jones & Blanca Vega — 2013
Examination of the political origins of state performance funding for higher education in six states (Florida, Illinois, Missouri, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington) and the lack of its development in another two states (California and Nevada).

by Erica Turner & Cynthia E. Coburn — 2012
Setting the stage for the special issue, this article discusses the increased attention to data use in policy and practice, provides an overview of the major ways that scholars have studied data use, highlights the limitations of the extant research, summarizes the contributions of the articles in this special issue to addressing these limitations, and previews the articles that follow.

by Jonathan Supovitz — 2012
This article reviews the literature on the qualities of assessments and identifies three crucial test design elements that can provide insightful feedback to teachers about students’ understanding to inform subsequent instructional choices.

Found 209
Displaying 1 to 30
<Back | Next>
Recent Posts
Book Reviews
by Todd Stanley
reviwed by Kendall Hartley & Cynthia Clark — 2015

by Linda Darling-Hammond & Frank Adamson
reviwed by Arlo Kempf — 2015

by Margaret Heritage
reviwed by Randall Davies — 2015

by Jim Horn & Denise Wilburn
reviwed by Christine Monaghan — 2014

by Stewart I. Donaldson (Ed.)
reviwed by Cara Jackson — 2014

by Thomas M. Haladyna & Michael C. Rodriguez
reviwed by Gregory Cizek — 2013

by William J. Reese
reviwed by Jack Schneider — 2013

by Pendred E. Noyce & Daniel T. Hickey (eds.)
reviwed by Heidi Burross — 2013

by Chester E. Finn & Jessica A. Hockett
reviwed by Julie Edmunds — 2013

Found 141
Displaying 1 to 10
<Back | Next>

Found 67Displaying 1 to 10 <Back | Next>
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue