Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements
Assessment & Evaluation


Articles
by Amanda Datnow, Bailey Choi, Vicki Park & Elise St. John — 2018
This article examines how teachers talk about student ability and achievement in the era of data-driven decision making and how their talk is shaped by the context in which they work.

by Sharon Nichols & Felicia Castro-Villarreal — 2017
Introduction to the special issue.

by Rhonda Bondie & Akane Zusho — 2017

by Won Kim — 2017
In this qualitative study, I examined 11 adolescent long-term English language learners’ (ELLs) educational experience via their voices in the context of their performances on state-mandated language and academic achievement tests. Findings derived from participants’ individual interviews and various school records indicated that participating ELLs experienced multiple layers of limited opportunity to learn as they moved through the educational process. Informed by the social capital framework research and theory, findings suggest that participants’ gaps in learning continued to grow with each subsequent year of schooling, exacerbated by their limited access to appropriate language programs and academic resources, thereby rendering them struggling, low-achieving, long-term ELLs. Despite their academic challenges, participating ELLs remained eager to succeed in school, which raises a critical question regarding how well the educational system is prepared to provide them with high quality, rigorous programs that are responsive to their linguistic and academic needs.

by Allison Roda — 2017
This paper analyzes the different ways in which white parents and parents of color conceive of good parenting in the era of high-stakes testing. It demonstrates the processes that help to produce inequities in our current educational system related to race, class, and G&T identification.

by Kate Phillipo, Jerusha Conner, Shannon Davidson & Denise Pope — 2017
This article systematically analyzes self-report student survey instruments that assess student-teacher relationships. From its results, implications are drawn for conceptual specification and future survey design.

by Alex Bowers, Mark Blitz, Marsha Modeste, Jason Salisbury & Richard Halverson — 2017
This study investigates the existence and extent of significantly different subgroups of teacher and leader responses to the Comprehensive Assessment of Leadership for Learning (CALL) survey. This survey is a formative assessment of school leadership developed by researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison employing the principles of distributed leadership and current research on leadership activities that promote student learning.

by Nandita Gawade & Robert Meyer — 2016
Authors use data from the Hillsborough County Public Schools in Florida to consider the consequences of particular characteristics of instruction and testing in high school for the modeling and estimation of value-added measures of school or teacher effectiveness.

by Federico Waitoller & Barbara Pazey — 2016
This article examines the tensions that can materialize at the intersection of high-stakes accountability assessments and the rights of parents of students with dis/abilities.

by Robert Cotto Jr. — 2016
Connecticut experienced two major changes in testing policy for children with disabilities that played a major role in conclusions about educational progress in the state. The responses to these changes in testing policy make Connecticut an illuminating case regarding the problem of high-stakes testing and changes in policies for students with disabilities in a state characterized by deep racial and economic inequity.

by Neal Kingston, Meagan Karvonen, Sue Bechard & Karen Erickson — 2016
The Dynamic Learning Maps™ Alternate Assessment is based on a different set of guiding principles than other assessments. In this article we describe its characteristics and look at the history of alternate assessment and the problems in implementing useful assessment programs for students with significant cognitive disabilities.

by Todd Glover, Linda Reddy, Ryan Kettler, Alexander Kunz & Adam Lekwa — 2016
The accountability movement and high-stakes testing fail to attend to ongoing instructional improvements based on the regular assessment of student skills and teacher practices. The purpose of this article is to describe the School System Improvement Project’s hybrid approach to utilizing both formative and summative assessments to (a) inform decisions about effective instruction based on all students’ and teachers’ needs, and (b) guide high-stakes decisions about teacher effectiveness.

by Argun Saatcioglu, Thomas Skrtic & Thomas DeLuca — 2016
Drawing on state-level panel data for the 2007–2009 period, this study examines the potential overuse of test accommodations for students with disabilities as a gaming strategy to inflate state-level proficiency gains in response to high-stakes accountability pressures. We identify particular conditions under which test accommodations are more likely to be used for gaming and specify several directions for further research.

by Julie Cohen, Lorien Chambers Schuldt, Lindsay Brown & Pamela Grossman — 2016
This mixed-methods study investigates a model of professional development built around a standardized classroom observation tool designed to measure the quality of teaching in middle school English Language Arts classrooms.

by Stuart Yeh — 2016
An analysis using a nationally-representative dataset suggests that raising test scores by one standard deviation (SD) would substantially reduce the probabilities that black, Hispanic, Asian, and white students would drop out of high school and would increase the probabilities that students would compile a rigorous high school record, complete algebra 2 in high school, enroll at a 4-year institution, and attain a baccalaureate degree.

by Curt Adams, Patrick Forsyth , Jordan Ware & Mwarumba Mwavita — 2016
This study evaluates the information significance of Oklahoma A–F school accountability grades relevant to the policy objective of achievement equity.

by Jacob Neumann — 2016
This article analyzes the effects of mandated accountability testing, teachers' knowledge and beliefs, and teachers' milieu on the work of four social studies teachers in one middle school in Texas. The article argues that more comprehensive and holistic research efforts are needed for researches to be able to more fully understand and communicate to readers the combination of factors that impact teachers' work.

by Stuart Yeh — 2015
The achievement gap may be explained as a consequence of the conventional structure of schooling and the failure to individualize task difficulty and provide performance feedback in a way that is necessary to ensure that all students experience mastery.

by Marty Pollio & Craig Hochbein — 2015
This study utilizes a non-equivalent control group design and quantitative analyses to compare the association between classroom grades and standardized test scores.

by Anne Traynor & Allison Chapman — 2015
To allay public concerns that state exit examination mandates might unfairly hinder some students’ educational attainment prospects, most states with exam requirements offer alternative routes to graduation for all students. This study probes the relationship between various exam difficulty-alternative route policy combinations and the subsequent attainment outcomes of tenth-graders.

by Kitae Sohn — 2015
This article demonstrates that the carryover effects of STAR’s small classes are not robust; the effects are driven mostly by a small number of STAR schools.

by Robert Mislevy — 2014
This article explains the idea of a neopragmatic postmodernist test theory and offers some thoughts about what changing notions concerning the nature of and meanings assigned to knowledge imply for educational assessment, present and future. Reprinted with permission from Transitions in Work and Learning: Implications for Assessment, 1997, by the National Academy of Sciences, Courtesy of the National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

by Kenneth Gergen & Ezekiel Dixon-Román — 2014
This article challenges the presumption that the educational testing of students provides objective information about such students.

by Joanna Gorin — 2014
This paper considers future educational assessment in terms of principles of evidential reasoning, focusing the discussion on the changes to the claims our assessments must support, the types of evidence needed to support these claims, and the statistical tools available to evaluate our evidence vis-à-vis the claims. An expanded view of assessment is advanced in which assessments based on multiple evidence sources from contextually rich situated learning environments, including unconventional data regarding human competencies, improve our ability to make valid inferences and decisions all education stakeholders.

by Brent Duckor & Daniel Perlstein — 2014
Educational researchers and policymakers have often lamented the failure of teachers to implement what they consider to be technically sound assessment procedures. Through a case study of New York City’s Central Park East Secondary School (CPESS), in the years when it served as a model for progressive American school reform, Duckor and Perlstein demonstrate the usefulness of an alternative to reliance of the technical characteristics of standardized tests for constructing and judging assessments: teachers’ self-conscious and reasoned articulation of their approaches to learning and assessment. They conclude that when teachers are given opportunities for genuine, shared reflection on teaching and learning and classroom practices are tied to this understanding, fidelity to what they call the logic of assessment offers a more promising framework for the improvement of schooling than current forms of high-stakes, standardized accountability. Thus, instead of expecting teachers to rely on data from standardized assessments or replicate features of standardized testing in their own assessment practices, researchers, policymakers and teacher educators should promote fidelity to the broader logic of assessment.

by Vincent Cho & Jeffrey Wayman — 2014
Drawing upon the concept of interpretive flexibility, this study illuminates some of the sensemaking processes around teachers’ uses of data and computer data systems. Accordingly, it provides recommendations regarding how researchers, school, and district leaders might be more attentive to the “people problems” around data system implementation.

by Alyson Lavigne, Thomas Good & Ronald Marx — 2014

by Thomas Good — 2014
In this article, the author describes the history of classroom research and notes that, despite potential for present day application, many of those who currently develop observational systems for evaluating teachers appear to be unaware of this literature. The author describes what we know about effective teaching, the limits of using this information, and the need for identifying new important outcomes of schooling that can be used in teacher evaluation.

by Spyros Konstantopoulos — 2014
This paper reviews the literature on teacher effects and focuses on value-added measures and their use in evaluating teachers. Suggestions about the use of value-added measures and about the future of teacher effects research are provided.

by Clarin Collins & Audrey Amrein-Beardsley — 2014
In this study, the researchers surveyed all 50 states and the District of Columbia to provide an inclusive national growth and value-added model overview.

Found 347
Displaying 1 to 30
<Back | Next>
Recent Posts
 
Book Reviews
by Anton O. Tolman & Janine Kremling (Eds.)
reviwed by Miriam Raider-Roth & Amy Rector-Aranda — 2017

by Heidi Anne E. Mesmer
reviwed by Mary Zipke & Susan F. Skawinski — 2017

by Terri Friel
reviwed by Linda Clark — 2017

by Charles C. Ragin & Peer C. Fiss
reviwed by Tiedan Huang — 2017

by Jessie L. Moore & Randall Bass (Eds.)
reviwed by Christina Dobbs — 2017

by Jennifer Sanders & Rebecca L. Damron
reviwed by Renee Casbergue & Julie Parrish — 2017

by W. Holmes Finch, Jason C. Immekus, & Brian F. French
reviwed by Marshall Beauchamp — 2017

by Stewart I. Donaldson & Robert Picciotto (Eds.)
reviwed by Robert Reardon — 2016

by Hong Jiao & Robert W. Lissitz (Eds.)
reviwed by Jaehwa Choi & Jaekyung Lee — 2016

Found 155
Displaying 1 to 10
<Back | Next>

Resources
  • American Educational Research Journal (AERJ)
    American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) has as its purpose to publish original empirical and theoretical studies and analyses in education.
  • Centre for Program Evaluation
    The Centre for Program Evaluation (CPE) is an evaluation and research centre located within the Department of Education Policy and Management in the Faculty of Education at The University of Melbourne, Australia.
  • Paying for University Research Facilities and Administration
    Federal spending for scientific research at U.S. academic institutions equals approximately $15 billion each year. According to the analysis in this report, about three-quarters of this amount supports the direct costs of conducting research.
  • Policy Studies
    Policy Studies is a refereed, multi-disciplinary journal focused on the policy implications of research and the analysis of developments in social policy and professional practice. Its standards are those of an academic journal, but it is designed to be read by policy makers and practitioners, as well as by academics and other researchers.
  • International Association for Educational Assessment
    The broad purpose of IAEA is to assist educational agencies in the development and appropriate application of educational assessment techniques to improve the quality of education.
  • The Strategic Education Research Program and the Public Value of Research
    This article presents the educational, political, and technological arguments for making the knowledge at issue more widely available and accessible, with an eye to increasing educational research’s contribution to the quality of public reason and deliberative democracy.
  • Education Policy Analysis Archives
    A peer-reviewed scholarly electronic journal published at Arizona State University.
  • Ericae.net
    Provides balanced information concerning educational assessment, evaluation and research methodology.
  • High Stakes: Testing for Tracking, Promotion, and Graduation
    Recommendations on the appropriate methods, practices, and safeguards for the use of high stakes testing
  • Phi Delta Kappan
    The Phi Delta Kappan publishes articles concerned with educational research, service, and leadership; issues, trends, and policy are emphasized.
  • National Assessment Governing Board
    The Governing Board is an independent, bipartisan group whose members include governors, state legislators, local and state school officials, educators, business representatives, and members of the general public.
Found 67Displaying 11 to 20 | Next>
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS