Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements
 

Co-Creating School Innovations: Should Self-Determination Be a Component of School Improvement?


by Christopher Redding & Samantha L. Viano — 2018

Background: Research suggests a number of benefits from teacher participation in school improvement—chief among them that it can increase teacher receptivity to innovation and reform adoption. Improvement science has been put forward as a new paradigm for involving local school stakeholders in the improvement process.

Purpose: We describe the beliefs held by teachers and teacher leaders during the development and implementation of a locally developed innovation. To explain why the beliefs of these two school stakeholder groups would differ, and the implications these differences have on receptivity to the innovation, we merge the sensemaking framework and status risk theory.

Setting: Three high schools in a large urban school district in the southwestern United States.

Research Design: The data for this study come from a seven-year study of the process of scaling up effective practices in a large urban district. This qualitative case study is based on transcripts from 260 semistructured interviews and 24 focus groups with development team members and teachers. We analyzed transcripts to understand participants’ attitudes toward and understanding of the innovation design.

Findings: Allowing for teacher self-determination in the innovation design and implementation helped to garner a high level of teacher buy-in to the innovation. Compared with externally developed reforms, the innovation was less challenging to teacher autonomy and was customized to fit the needs of their students. These conditions led to high levels of teacher ownership over the innovation. Yet, in the process, teacher leaders grounded the innovation in preexisting and easy-to-implement practices that did not require significant investment from teachers to adopt.

Conclusions: Teacher self-determination in the innovation development process contributed to greater teacher ownership of, and receptivity to, organizational change, but at the cost of adopting more ambitious practices that likely had a greater chance of improving instruction and positive student outcomes.



To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Co-Creating School Innovations: Should Self-Determination Be a Component of School Improvement?
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Visitor
Choose this to join the mailing list or add an announcement.
$0
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 120 Number 11, 2018, p. -
http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 22453, Date Accessed: 8/16/2018 9:39:07 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
 
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
 
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Christopher Redding
    University of Florida
    E-mail Author
    CHRISTOPHER REDDING is an assistant professor in the Department of Human Development and Organizational Studies in Education at the University of Florida’s College of Education. His research focuses on teacher labor markets, teacher education and development, and school improvement. His work has recently been published in the American Educational Research Journal and AERA Open.
  • Samantha Viano
    George Mason University
    E-mail Author
    SAMANTHA L. VIANO is an assistant professor of education in the Graduate School of Education at George Mason University. Her research focuses on evaluating policies and assessing school contexts that predominantly affect at-risk student populations and their teachers. Her work recently has been published in the American Journal of Distance Education and the Journal of School Violence.
 
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS