Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements

The Informational Significance of AF School Accountability Grades


by Curt M. Adams, Patrick B. Forsyth , Jordan Ware & Mwarumba Mwavita 2016

Background/Context. Despite problems with accountability systems under No Child Left Behind, the policy has been widely commended for exposing the depth and breadth of educational inequality in the United States. As states implement new accountability systems, there is growing concern that attention to achievement gaps and the performance of marginalized children has faded. Many approved accountability plans no longer report achievement by student subgroups or include subgroup performance in the calculation of accountability indicators.

Research Purpose. This study examined the informational significance of Oklahomas AF accountability grades relative to the policy objective of achievement equity. Informational significance as explained in self-determination theory provided a framework to explore the usefulness of an AF grade for understanding achievement differences within and between schools.

Research Design. We evaluated the informational significance of Oklahoma AF school grades by analyzing reading and math test scores from over 25,000 students in 81 elementary and middle schools. The study was designed to address two questions: Do students in A and B schools have high average achievement and small achievement gaps compared to students in D and F schools? What is the difference in average achievement and achievement gaps between school grades when holding constant contextual school conditions?

Results. We found test score gaps attributed to Free and Reduced Lunch qualification and minority status. Free and Reduced Lunch and minority students average about one standard deviation lower in math and reading than their peers. Test score gaps varied across AF school grades with the largest gaps existing in A and B schools. HLM results showed that AF grades do not differentiate schools by effectiveness levels. For reading, we did not find statistically significant main effects attributed to letter grades. For math, the only statistically significance difference was between students in A and B schools and students in F schools. This difference had a small effect size. School grades did moderate achievement gaps, but gaps moved in a direction opposite from what would be desired of an accountability system that measured achievement equity.

Conclusions. Progress made under NCLB in exposing achievement inequity in the U.S. has taken a step back with Oklahomas AF school grades. Our evidence suggests that a composite letter grade provides very little meaningful information about achievement differences.



To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase The Informational Significance of AF School Accountability Grades
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 118 Number 7, 2016, p. 1-31
http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 20925, Date Accessed: 8/17/2017 1:23:39 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles
There are no related articles to display

Related Discussion
 
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Curt Adams
    University of Oklahoma
    E-mail Author
    CURT M. ADAMS is an associate professor in the department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at the University of Oklahoma, and co-director of the Oklahoma Center for Education Policy. Recent publications include the journal article, "Self-Regulatory Climate: A Social Resource for Student Regulation and Achievement" (Teachers College Record, 2015), and the book Quantitative Research in Education: A Prime with Wayne Hoy (SAGE, 2015).
  • Patrick Forsyth
    University of Oklahoma
    E-mail Author
    PATRICK B. FORSYTH is professor of education at the University of Oklahoma, codirector of the Center for Education Policy, and former executive director of UCEA and The National Policy Board for Educational Administration. Recent books include Trust and School Life (2014, Springer) with D. Van Maele and M. Van Houtte, and Collective Trust (2011, Teachers College Press) with C. M. Adams and W. K. Hoy.
  • Jordan Ware
    University of Oklahoma
    E-mail Author
    JORDAN WARE is a post-doctoral social scientist at the University of Oklahoma and the Oklahoma Center for Education Policy where he directs the project to measure and improve school capacity. He studies neighborhood poverty and its effects on learning and development.
  • Mwarumba Mwavita
    Oklahoma State University
    E-mail Author
    MWARUMBA MWAVITA is an assistant professor of Research, Evaluation, Measurement, and Statistics at Oklahoma State University. He is also Director of the Center for Educational Research and Evaluation.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS