Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements

Structuring Opportunity After Entry: Who Has Access to High Quality Instruction During College?


by Josipa Roksa ó 2016

Background/Context: When inequality of opportunity is discussed in higher education, it typically pertains to access to college. Ample research has examined sociodemographic inequalities in transition to higher education and enrollment in particular types of institutions. Although providing valuable insights, social stratification research does not dedicate the same attention to studentsí experiences during college and, more specifically, to inequalities in instructional quality.

Research Questions: Conceptualizing opportunity in terms of instructional quality, I address two specific questions: First, do students from all sociodemographic groups report similar levels of instructional quality? And second, do students report changes in instructional quality during their time in college?

Research Design: This study relies on data from three cohorts of students who entered college in the fall of 2006, 2007, and 2008 and were followed through the end of their senior year in the Wabash National Study (WNS) of Liberal Arts Education. In addition to studentsí background characteristics, WNS includes detailed information regarding studentsí college experiences, including instruction.

Results: The results reveal a substantial amount of variability in studentsí reports of instructional quality. Notably, this variation is not systematically related to studentsí sociodemographic characteristics, net of controls. However, the results also reveal a considerable amount of path dependency, with approximately half of the students reporting the same level of instructional quality at the beginning and end of college. Academic achievement is related to studentsí reports of instructional quality in the first year, after which academic inertia carries students toward the end. Academic motivation, on the other hand, facilitates mobility to higher levels of instructional quality over time and is particularly beneficial for students who begin college reporting a low level of instructional quality.

Conclusion: Reported patterns offer insights into social stratification and path dependence of studentsí experiences during college. Moreover, patterns of stability and change in studentsí reports of instructional quality have implications for studies of college impact. The article concludes with reflections on different conceptualizations of instructional quality and recommendations for future research.



To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Structuring Opportunity After Entry: Who Has Access to High Quality Instruction During College?
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 118 Number 2, 2016, p. 1-28
http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 18231, Date Accessed: 8/17/2017 1:21:32 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
 
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Josipa Roksa
    University of Virginia
    E-mail Author
    JOSIPA ROKSA is Associate Professor of Sociology and Education at the University of Virginia. Roksa has examined inequality in higher education from different perspectives, studying a range of topics from remedial education and transfer between two-year and four-year institutions, to the role of state contexts in shaping access and attainment in higher education, and the importance of life course transitions, including work, marriage/cohabitation and parenthood, for educational success. In addition to her research on inequality in entry and completion, she is co-author of two volumes examining how much students learn in higher education and what consequences that has for their lives beyond college: Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses (University of Chicago Press, 2011) and Aspiring Adults Adrift: Tentative Transitions of College Graduates (University of Chicago Press, 2014).
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS