Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements

Central Office Leadership in Principal Professional Learning Communities: The Practice Beneath the Policy


by Meredith I. Honig & Lydia R. Rainey — 2014

Background/Context: Some school districts across the country have begun to convene principals in professional learning communities (PPLC) as a strategy to help principals develop as instructional leaders, and they have designated executive-level central office staff to lead the PPLCs. Extant research suggests the promise of PPLCs for supporting principal development but raises significant questions about what central office leadership of such PPLCs entails and if central office administrators are up to the task.

Purpose/Research Questions: This paper examines the following questions: To what extent are the central office administrators who run PPLCs actually doing so in ways consistent with the goal of supporting principals’ learning to strengthen their instructional leadership? What conditions help or hinder them in the process?

Research Design: We explored these questions with an embedded, comparative, qualitative case study of six PPLCs convened by central office administrators in one urban district. We used a conceptual framework, derived from socio-cultural learning theory, to help us identify and understand central office administrators’ practices in the PPLCs. Our data sources primarily included direct observations of 105 hours of PPLC meetings, supplemented with 46 semi-structured interviews and reviews of more than 150 documents.

Findings: We found that the central office administrators varied in how they participated in the PPLC meetings, particularly in terms of the extent to which they engaged in the teaching practices identified in our conceptual framework. The central office administrators who most frequently engaged in those practices were also the central office administrators we associated with such positive results as their principals’ engagement in progressively more challenging instructional leadership activities during PPLC meetings, and principals’ detailed reports of the value of the PPLC meetings to their development as instructional leaders. Key mediators of central office administrators’ participation in the meetings include their executive-level positions, other central office staff and principal demands, the availability of professional development, and their own orientations to the work.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that central office administrators are able to buck institutional trends and productively lead PPLCs provided (1) they come to the work with a teaching rather than directive or managerial orientation, and (2) central offices intentionally create other conditions to foster their success. Future research should aim to further understanding of principal learning in PPLCs and how central office and other leaders can productively facilitate the process.



To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Central Office Leadership in Principal Professional Learning Communities: The Practice Beneath the Policy
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 116 Number 4, 2014, p. -
http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 17404, Date Accessed: 4/24/2017 9:15:41 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
 
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Meredith Honig
    University of Washington
    E-mail Author
    MEREDITH I. HONIG is Associate Professor of educational policy and leadership at the University of Washington. Her research focuses on innovation, decision-making, and organizational change in public-sector organizations with a focus on school district central offices. She is especially interested in how leaders learn to perform for improved teaching and learning at scale. Her recent publications related to this article include “District Central Office Leadership as Learning: How Central Offices Administrators Support Principals’ Development as Instructional Leaders,” Educational Administration Quarterly; and “School District Central Office Transformation as Teaching and Learning: A Report to the Wallace Foundation” (with M. Copland, L. Rainey, and others).
  • Lydia Rainey
    University of Washington
    E-mail Author
    LYDIA R. RAINEY is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Washington’s College of Education, where she is an IES CREST Fellow. Her dissertation examines how school staff implements data-driven decision-making policies. Her research interests include organizational decision making, data and evidence use, and educational policy and reform implementation. Her recent publications include “Autonomy and School Improvement: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go from Here?”, Educational Policy (with M. Honig).
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS