Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements

Teacher Effects, Value-Added Models, and Accountability


by Spyros Konstantopoulos — 2014

Background: In the last decade, the effects of teachers on student performance (typically manifested as state-wide standardized tests) have been re-examined using statistical models that are known as value-added models. These statistical models aim to compute the unique contribution of the teachers in promoting student achievement gains from grade to grade, net of student background and prior ability. Value-added models are widely used nowadays and they are used by some states to rank teachers. These models are used to measure teacher performance or effectiveness (via student achievement gains), with the ultimate objective of rewarding or penalizing teachers. Such practices have resulted in a large amount of controversy in the education community about the role of value-added models in the process of making important decisions about teachers such as salary increases, promotion, or termination of employment.

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review the effects teachers have on student achievement, with an emphasis on value-added models. The paper also discusses whether value-added models are appropriately used as a sole indicator in evaluating teachers’ performance and making critical decisions about teachers’ futures in the profession.

Research Design: This is a narrative review of the literature on teacher effects that includes evidence about the stability of teacher effects using value-added models.

Conclusions: More comprehensive systems for teacher evaluation are needed. We need more research on value-added models and more work on evaluating value-added models. The strengths and weaknesses of these models should be clearly described. We also need much more empirical evidence with respect to the reliability and the stability of value-added measures across different states. The findings thus far do not seem robust and conclusive enough to warrant decisions about raises, tenure, or termination of employment. In other words, it is unclear that the value-added measures that inform the accountability system are adequate. It is not obvious that we are better equipped now to make such important decisions about teachers than we were 35 years ago. Good et al. have argued that we need well-thought-out and well-developed criteria that guide accountability decisions. Perhaps such criteria should be standardized across school districts and states. That would ensure that empirical evidence across different states is comparable and would help determine whether findings converge or diverge.



To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Teacher Effects, Value-Added Models, and Accountability
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Visitor
Choose this to join the mailing list or add an announcement.
$0
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 116 Number 1, 2014, p. -
http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 17290, Date Accessed: 3/26/2017 3:18:58 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
 
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Spyros Konstantopoulos
    Michigan State University
    E-mail Author
    SPYROS KONSTANTOPOULOS is associate professor of measurement and quantitative methods at the Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education at the College of Education at Michigan State University. His research interests include class size effects, teacher and school effects, program evaluation, research design, and meta-analysis. Recent papers include: Konstantopoulos S. (2011). Teacher effects in early grades? Evidence from a randomized experiment. Teachers College Record, 113, 1541–1565. Konstantopoulos S. & Chung, V. (2011). The persistence of teacher effects in elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 361–386.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS