Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements

Media Comparison Studies: Problems and Possibilities


by Bryan R. Warnick & Nicholas C. Burbules — 2007

Background/Context: Media comparison studies aim to compare the relative effectiveness of different media at promoting educational outcomes. While these types of studies remain popular, they have been under attack for more than two decades. Critics of media comparison studies claim that continued studies are unhelpful because a great number of research projects have already shown that media produce “no significant difference” in learning outcomes. They also claim that the studies that do find a difference among media are flawed because of a conflation of “media” with “method.” These claims suggest the need for conceptual clarification.

Purpose of Study: The purposes of this study are: (1) to uncover and evaluate the conceptual assumptions that are made in debates about media comparison studies, (2) to make some suggestions for how media comparison studies could be made more useful and interesting. .

Research Design: The methodology used in this study is a conceptual and philosophical analysis. .

Findings: The analysis produces three major findings. First, the debate so far has not examined the underlying assumptions involved in the process of making a comparison. Second, there has been a failure to appreciate how general comparative statements across media technologies must stipulate contexts of use, as well as a failure to examine the implications for the debate that flow from this requirement. Third, the concept of a “medium” has not been explored with sufficient depth, either with regard to how this concept is different from “method,” or to how this concept is itself a contestable metaphor for classroom technologies. .

Recommendations: In the end, the following suggestions are offered for media comparison researchers: (1) Media researchers should realize that claims about a “significant difference” and about whether something “matters” to learning, will always be limited to particular educational goals and contexts of use -- no global statements can be made about such things. (2) New media technologies can and should be compared with regard to the different educational ends they make possible rather than as mere means to an end that is already assumed. (3) Media researchers need to explore the educational importance of media that extend beyond intended aspects. Such a research program would benefit from adopting the “space” metaphor, from looking at educationally practices more holistically, and from a robust qualitative element in the comparative research.



To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Media Comparison Studies: Problems and Possibilities
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 109 Number 11, 2007, p. -
http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 14566, Date Accessed: 10/22/2017 5:04:06 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
 
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Bryan Warnick
    The Ohio State University
    E-mail Author
    BRYAN R. WARNICK is Assistant Professor in the School of Educational Policy and Leadership at The Ohio State University. His research interests include philosophy of education, ethics, educational technology, and learning theory. He is the author of “Technological metaphors and moral education: The hacker ethic and the computational experience,” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 23(4) and, with David Waddington, “The gathering: An ethical and educational criterion for educational technology,” Educational Technology, 44(5).
  • Nicholas Burbules
    University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
    E-mail Author
    NICHOLAS C. BURBULES is Grayce Wicall Gauthier Professor in the Department of Educational Policy Studies at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. His main research areas are philosophy of education, technology studies in education, and critical social and political theory. His most recent work includes "Philosophical inquiry" (co-authored with Bryan R. Warnick) in Complementary Methods for Research in Education, 3rd Edition, Judith Green, Gregory Camilli, and Patricia Elmore, (Eds.), Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 2006, and "Rethinking the virtual," in The International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments, Joel Weiss, Jason Nolan, and Peter Trifonas, (Eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishers, 2006.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS