Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13

Minimum Competency Tests: A Negative View

by A. Guy Larkins 1981

Most of the arguments against minimum competency tests are not peculiar to social studies, and for that reason the bulk of this chapter focuses on characteristics of the movement in general. There may be some ways, however, in which the relation between social studies and minimum competency tests is special. A brief section at the close of this chapter outlines arguments that might apply to social studies more than to other areas of the public school curriculum.

To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
Purchase this Article
Purchase Minimum Competency Tests: A Negative View
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.

This article originally appeared in NSSE Yearbook Vol. 80, No. 2.

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 82 Number 6, 1981, p. 126-150
http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 19170, Date Accessed: 8/18/2018 11:45:39 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • A. Larkins
    University of Georgia
    A. GUY LARKINS is an Associate Professor of Social Studies Education at the University of Georgia.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue