Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements
 

Educational Bankruptcy, Takeovers, and Reconstitution of Failing Schools


by James G. Cibulka - 2003

Accountability can be viewed both as a prevention for abuses of power and as a corrective device once those abuses occur. Hence, higher levels of government can intervene with lower levels when there is evidence that corrective action is needed. This corrective dimension of accountability tends to lead to policy approaches that are highly directive and top-down. The implicit assumption in such approaches is that unacceptable behavior can be eliminated only through the use of regulatory sanctions. Depending on the nature of the violation and the remedy sought, a theory of motivation that relies heavily on compliance may or may not be appropriate for bringing about wanted changes.

View Full Text in PDF Format

This article originally appeared as NSSE Yearbook Vol 102. No. 1.


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 105 Number 10, 2003, p. 249-270
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 18665, Date Accessed: 1/20/2022 2:33:07 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
 
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
 
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • James Cibulka
    University of Kentucky
    E-mail Author
    JAMES G. CIBULKA is Dean of the College of Education and Professor in the Department of Administration and Supervision and in the Department of Educational Policy Studies and Evaluation at the University of Kentucky.
 
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS