Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13

Can We Define Good Teaching?

by Harry S. Broudy - 1969

Educators, in their sometimes desperate efforts to find models for good teaching, often end with an either/or: technology or aesthetics; didactics or encounter. The author discusses the difficulties of definition and then goes on to break through the either/or. Didactic teaching (after the model of programmed instruction), he says, is the kind of teaching for which outcomes, means, and criteria can be made explicit; and it will be the dominant mode in time to come. Encounter teaching (after the model of the humanely cultivated person) may become possible as teachers are freed by technology; but here neither outcomes, nor means, nor criteria can be specified. The problem, Dr. Broudy, concludes, is "to lure" enough people into the schools to do a kind of teaching which cannot be finally defined.

To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
Purchase this Article
Purchase Can We Define Good Teaching?
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.

Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 70 Number 7, 1969, p. 583-592
https://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 1834, Date Accessed: 8/15/2020 1:21:00 AM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue