“There is Space, and There are Limits”: The Challenge of Teaching Controversial Topics in an Illiberal Democracy by Li-Ching Ho, Theresa Alviar-Martin & Enrique Niño P. Leviste — 2014Background/Context: Research indicates that across democratic societies, teachers face numerous intellectual and emotional challenges when handling controversial topics in the classroom. Less attention, however, has been paid to how teachers’ willingness to teach controversial topics intersects with political and other societal factors in different sociopolitical milieu and, in particular, in an authoritarian–democratic and culturally diverse state like Singapore.
Focus of Study: This study focused on constraints to the teaching of controversial topics relating to diversity and the manner in which teachers navigated their personal beliefs amidst the evolving contours of public and official discourses in Singapore. By attending to the intersections of teachers’ beliefs, state policies, and other sociopolitical factors, we aimed to inform scholarship on the teaching of controversial topics and illuminate states’ powers to demarcate the discursive spaces of teachers.
Research Design: The study adhered to the qualitative case study design. We collected data from interviews that featured various elicitation tasks to describe 35 social studies teachers’ perceptions and practice of controversial issues discussions relating to topics of diversity. Additionally, we drew on policy and curricular documents to portray the evolving contours of public discourse in Singapore.
Findings/Results: The findings highlight how the participants, influenced largely by state policies, differentiated between topics that were controversial-appropriate and controversial-taboo. In spite of the numerous legal constraints limiting the nature of public discussion of race and politics, the majority of the teachers regarded these topics as controversial-appropriate. There was, conversely, a consensus among the participants that topics related to sexual orientation were controversial-taboo even though there were no similar laws constraining public discussion of this issue.
Conclusions/Recommendations: This study challenges conventional assumptions about the impact that state-imposed constraints and controls have on the teaching of controversial topics in schools. Under some circumstances, state controls and constraints can result in teachers having more freedom to discuss controversial topics because of the clearly demarcated political and social boundaries. However, if the state’s position is ambiguous, this may result in a Kafkaesque situation in which teachers become even more conservative in their curriculum decision making due to a heightened sense of uncertainty and insecurity. Ultimately, the study brings to light the nuanced ways that state control and censorship influence the spaces and limits of issues-centered discussion, and underlines the need for research that attends to various social forces that frame the teaching of controversial topics in different democratic settings.
To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below: |
- Constructive Conflict: How Controversy
Can Contribute to School Improvement
- Teaching Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Key Issues and Debates
- Teachers' Rights, Academic Freedom, and the Teaching of Controversial Issues
- Controversy and Consensus in Common School Reform
- The State of Citizen Participation in America
- Participatory Democracy and Struggling Schools: Making Space for Youth in School Turnarounds
- Sociocultural Studies in Education: Critical Thinking for Democracy
- Teaching that Matters: Engaging Minds, Improving Schools
- Democracy's Education: Public Work, Citizenship, and the Future of Colleges and Universities
- Historical Sketch of Activism
- Definition of the Activity Movement Today
- Supporting Controversial Issues Discussion in the Charged Classroom
- Alternative Learning Contexts and the Goals of Democracy in Education
- Social Harmony and Diversity: The Affordances and Constraints of Harmony as an Educational Goal
- The Students are Listening: Elementary Education’s Responsibility to Young Citizens Beyond the Rituals of Democratic Citizenship
- Love Trumps Fear: The Need to Refocus Our Educational Policies
- Teach on Purpose! Responsive Teaching for Student Success
- Preparing Students for a Diverse, Deliberative Democracy: College Diversity Experiences and Informed Citizenship After College
- White Women’s Work: Examining the Intersectionality of Teaching, Identity, and Race
- Teaching Controversial Issues: The Case for Critical Thinking and Moral Commitment in the Classroom
- Knowing What’s Local: Ethnographic Inquiry, Education, and Democracy
- What’s Worth Teaching: Rethinking Curriculum in the Age of Technology
- Li-Ching Ho
National Institute of Education, Singapore
LI-CHING HO is an assistant professor of social studies education at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Her research interests include democratic and multicultural citizenship education. Her recent publications include “Sorting citizens: Differentiated citizenship education in Singapore,” Journal of Curriculum Studies (2012) and “Civic disparities: Exploring students’ perceptions of citizenship within Singapore’s academic tracks,” Theory and Research in Social Education (2011).
- Theresa Alviar-Martin
Hong Kong Institute of Education
THERESA ALVIAR-MARTIN is an assistant professor at the Hong Kong Institute of Education. Her research focuses on curriculum development, instruction, and learning of democratic citizenship from multicultural, global, and comparative perspectives. Recent publications include "Reconciling Multiple Conceptions of Citizenship: International School Teachers Beliefs and Practice" in the Journal of Education and "Curriculum Integration in Singapore: Teachers' Perspectives and Practice" in Teaching and Teacher Education.
- Enrique Leviste
Ateneo de Manila University
ENRIQUE NIÑO P. LEVISTE is an assistant professor at the Ateneo de Manila University. He earned his PhD in sociology from National University of Singapore in 2011. His research interests include political sociology, sociology of education, and democratization in Southeast Asia.