|
|
|
Non-Evidence about Tracking: Critiquing the New Report from the Fordham Institute by Kevin G. Welner — December 14, 2009A new report authored by Tom Loveless and published by the Fordham Institute misleads in an attempt to convince policymakers to maintain tracking policies. The report combines weak data with questionable analyses to manufacture a flawed argument against detracking. To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below:
|
|
|
- Kevin Welner
University of Colorado at Boulder
E-mail Author
KEVIN G. WELNER is Professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder. His present research examines small school reforms, tuition tax credit voucher policies, and various issues concerning the intersection between education rights litigation and educational opportunity scholarship. His past research studied the change process associated with equity-minded reform efforts - reforms aimed at benefiting those who hold less powerful school and community positions (primarily Latinos, African Americans, and the poor).
|
|
|
|
|
Email this article
Print this article
Post a Comment
