Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements

Choice, Equity, and the Schools-Within-Schools Reform


by Douglas D. Ready & Valerie E. Lee — 2008

Background/Context: There is general agreement that most public high schools should be smaller than they are. Although the small-schools movement attracts considerable support, there is a general reluctance or inability to close large schools and to build many new small schools. A more cost-effective approach is to divide larger high schools into several smaller units, typically called schools within schools (SWS). We use the term subunit to describe these smaller educational groupings, which are generally organized around themes, careers, or pedagogical approaches intended to appeal to students’ interests and future plans. The majority of SWS designs then allow students to select their subunits. As such, the SWS model represents a convergence of two popular reform efforts—the movement to create smaller high schools, and the push to increase educational choice.

Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study: This article addresses three questions related to academic differentiation and student choice within SWS high schools. First, to what extent did subunit themes emphasize students’ disparate occupational and educational futures over their common social and academic needs? Second, what rationales did students offer for their subunit selections, and how did their choices reflect their interests, motivations, social backgrounds, and academic abilities? Third, how can we characterize the interplay between subunit offerings, students’ subunit choices, and educational equity?

Research Design: This article draws on data collected over several years in a sustained field-based study of five SWS high schools. Our data collection included conducting individual and focus group interviews with students, teachers, guidance counselors, and school- and district-level administrators; shadowing students; visiting selected classrooms; observing interactions in hallways and other public locations; attending special events that occurred during our visit; mapping the physical layout of the building; collecting papers and documents pertinent to school life; and learning about the contexts in which the school operated.

Conclusions/Recommendations: Each school offered subunits organized around academic subjects, career focuses, or pedagogical approaches. Certain subunits were designed for students seeking traditional vocational training, whereas others targeted academically motivated college-bound students. Although students ostensibly selected subunits that matched their interests and motivations, varied social and structural pressures beyond subunit themes influenced their choices. As a result, to varying degrees within schools, subunits were segregated and stratified by student race/ethnicity, social class, and—above all—academic performance. With stark parallels to student curricular choice in comprehensive high schools, many school staff viewed these within-school divisions as the natural (and even appropriate) outcome of student social and academic difference.



To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Choice, Equity, and the Schools-Within-Schools Reform
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 110 Number 9, 2008, p. 1930-1958
http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 15178, Date Accessed: 12/17/2017 10:25:08 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools

Related Media


Related Articles

Related Discussion
 
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Douglas D. Ready
    Teachers College, Columbia University
    E-mail Author
    DOUGLAS READY is an assistant professor at Teachers College, Columbia University. A sociologist of education, his research examines the influence of educational policies and practices on educational equity and access. Teachers College Press recently published Schools Within Schools: Possibilities and Pitfalls of High School Reform, coauthored with Valerie Lee.
  • Valerie E. Lee
    University of Michigan
    VALERIE E. LEE is a professor of education at the University of Michigan, where she teaches courses in research methods, including a new course in mixed methods. Her research interests focus on issues of educational equity. Currently, she is engaged in a multiyear evaluation of systemwide reform of the high school curriculum in Chicago. She also works with international colleagues studying educational reform in Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS