Home Articles Reader Opinion Editorial Book Reviews Discussion Writers Guide About TCRecord
transparent 13
Topics
Discussion
Announcements

Offensive Speech in Educational Materials: Changing Words Without Censorship


by Sarah M. McGough — 2007

Background/Context:

Diane Ravitch has focused on the extensive censorship occurring within the publication of school textbook and testing materials in her book, The Language Police (2003). This book, indicative of conservative frustrations with minority special interest groups, raises several key issues echoed throughout the larger educational movement in which she is located and serves as an excellent example to be more closely scrutinized. In attempts to assuage racism, sexism, and other types of discrimination, bias panels selected by publishers of educational materials often remove offensive speech and insert words and examples that run counter to many stereotypes.

Purpose/Objective/Research Questions/Focus of Study:

This article examines Ravitch’s approach to curtailing censorship in educational materials, with the purpose of offering a more nuanced account of harmful language in educational texts and an alternative approach to dealing with these texts in the classroom.

Research Design:

This is an interpretive study that philosophically analyzes the account of language offered by Ravitch and other theorists of biased speech. I use Judith Butler’s discursive account of language to address Ravitch’s shortcomings and to theorize for the injurious nature of biased speech.

Conclusions/Recommendations:

Although agreeing with Ravitch that censorship is alarming and should be curtailed, I argue that she undertheorizes language and fails to fully account for its harmful capacities. She operates with a representational view of language that leads her to conclude that educational materials should work to maintain a common culture that supposedly reflects the conditions of the real world, even if they do include harmful language. Building on Butler’s work, I contend that schools can become potential centers for challenging harmful speech through the historical analysis of its ability to injure, and I suggest fruitful ways in which publishers can challenge biased speech, without censoring it, through their own reworkings of problematic words.



To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below:

Sign-in
Email:
Password:
Store a cookie on my computer that will allow me to skip this sign-in in the future.
Send me my password -- I can't remember it
 
Purchase this Article
Purchase Offensive Speech in Educational Materials: Changing Words Without Censorship
Individual-Resource passes allow you to purchase access to resources one resource at a time. There are no recurring fees.
$12
Become a Member
Online Access
With this membership you receive online access to all of TCRecord's content. The introductory rate of $25 is available for a limited time.
$25
Print and Online Access
With this membership you receive the print journal and free online access to all of TCRecord's content.
$210


Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record Volume 109 Number 4, 2007, p. 973-990
http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 12870, Date Accessed: 10/21/2017 3:34:18 PM

Purchase Reprint Rights for this article or review
Article Tools
Related Articles

Related Discussion
 
Post a Comment | Read All

About the Author
  • Sarah McGough
    Miami University
    E-mail Author
    SARAH M. MCGOUGH is a visiting assistant professor in the department of Educational Leadership at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio. Her primary areas of scholarship are philosophy of education, pragmatism, feminist theory, and poststructuralism. Her most recent work investigates how gender and race might be transformed through the teaching of flexible habits.
Member Center
In Print
This Month's Issue

Submit
EMAIL

Twitter

RSS