“Your Father Works For My Father”: Race, Class and the Politics of Voluntarily Mandated Desegregation by Stephen Samuel Smith, Karen M. Kedrowski, Joseph M. Ellis & Judy Longshaw — 2008Background/Context:
Unlike the situation nationally where desegregation progress is faltering, the school district in Rock Hill, South Carolina, has recently undertaken measures to increase balance in pupil assignment despite considerable local opposition to these measures and the absence of a court order requiring the district to do so. Moreover, while other districts that are also pursuing desegregation increasingly rely on voluntary strategies such as magnets, the Rock Hill school district has relied more on adjusting the boundaries of mandatory attendance zones. This article investigates the conditions and developments that facilitated the school district’s voluntarily increasing its desegregation efforts through the use mandatory strategies. In so doing, the article expands upon our previous work that raises the possibility of a new politics of school desegregation.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study:
The purpose of this essay is to clarify the meaning of voluntary desegregation; to understand the political, demographic, and other conditions that affected desegregation efforts in Rock Hill; and to relate these conditions to broader issues such as the changed (since the civil rights era) relationship between the federal government and local school districts on issues involving desegregation, the relative merits of race- versus class-based public policy, citizen participation in desegregation planning, and the Supreme Court’s consideration of voluntary desegregation.
Rock Hill South Carolina
We find that Rock Hill’s school desegregation efforts were facilitated by a change in school board elections, the current relatively loose coupling of policy venues on issues involving desegregation, the overlap between the interests of Blacks and working-class Whites in the development of a high school reassignment plan, citizen participation in desegregation planning, and effective leadership from the district’s administration. The findings from this case study suggest that in some situations class-based public policy is more effective than race-based public policy, but they also caution equally strongly against making any sweeping claims for the generic effectiveness of class-based public policy. The findings also suggest why and how, contrary to the situation in the civil rights era, the workings of local politics in southern school districts may currently be consistent with the pursuit of school desegregation, not antithetical to it. Because of this consistency, a Supreme Court ruling against voluntary desegregation may be viewed as undermining not only the pursuit of equality of opportunity, but also the democratic ideal of popular sovereignty.
To view the full-text for this article you must be signed-in with the appropropriate membership. Please review your options below: |
- A Victory of Sorts: Desegregation in a Southern Community
- After "Brown”: The Rise and Retreat of School Desegregation
- Building a Constituency for School Desegregation: African-American Women in Boston, 1962-1972
- City-Suburban Desegregation and Forced Choices: A Review Essay of Susan Eaton's The Other Boston Busing Story
- Paradoxes of Desegregation: African American Struggles for Educational Equity in Charleston, South Carolina, 1926-1972
- The Conspiracy of the Good: Civil Rights and the Struggle for Community in Two American Cities, 1875-2000
- Ten Years Later: New Census Data Supports View that Welfare Reform Failed by Denying Access to Higher Education
- Black Women and the Other "N" Word
- Encouraging Agitation: An African American Woman’s Response To Words That Wound
- A Practical End to Racial Diversity in Schools
- Refusing to Leave Desegregation Behind: From Graduates of Racially Diverse Schools to the Supreme Court
- Justice, Justice: School Politics and the Eclipse of Liberalism (History of Schools and Schooling, V. 40)
- Still Separate and Unequal: Segregation and the Future of Urban School Reform
- Graduating Class: Disadvantaged Students Crossing the Bridge of Higher Education
- Class Counts: Education, Inequality, and the Shrinking Middle Class
- Learning Privilege: Lessons of Power and Identity in Affluent Schooling
- “A Radical Thing”: Educational Perspectives on Race in the Age of Obama
- Because of Race: How Americans Debate Harm and Opportunity in Our Schools
- Political Use of Racial Narratives: School Desegregation in Mobile, Alabama 1954-1997
- The Bus Kids: Children's Experiences with Voluntary Desegregation
- School Job Placement: Can It Avoid Reproducing Social Inequalities?
- The Paradoxes of Integration: Race, Neighborhood, and Civic Life in Multiethnic America
- Growing Up in America: The Power of Race in the Lives of Teens
- Learning in a Burning House: Educational Inequality, Ideology, and (Dis)Integration
- Acting White: The Ironic Legacy of Desegregation
- “No Unfavorable Comments from Any Quarter”: Teaching Black History to White Students in the American South, 1928–1943
- Integrating Schools in a Changing Society: New Policies and Legal Options for a Multiracial Generation
- The Resegregation of Suburban Schools: The Hidden Crisis in American Education
- On the Same Track: How Schools Can Join the Twenty-First-Century Struggle Against Resegregation
- The Fragmentation of Metropolitan Public School Districts and the Segregation of American Schools: A Longitudinal Analysis
- Disposed to Learn: Schooling, Ethnicity and the Scholarly Habitus
- The Politics of Race, Class and Special Education
- "When Race Breaks Out": Conversations About Race and Racism in College Classrooms
- How Real Is Race?: A Sourcebook on Race, Culture, and Biology
- Racial Differences in Teacher Perception of Student Ability
- The Whole World is Texting: Youth Protest in the Information Age
- Locating the Problem Within: Race, Learning Disabilities, and Science
- Are You Mixed? A War Bride’s Granddaughter’s Narrative of Lives In-Between Contested Race, Gender, Class, and Power
- Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow: School Desegregation and Resegregation in Charlotte
- Stephen Smith
STEPHEN SAMUEL SMITH is a professor of political science at Winthrop University. He served as an expert witness for NAACP’s Legal Defense and Educational Fund in the reopened Swann litigation and is the author of Boom for Whom? Education, Desegregation, and Development in Charlotte (SUNY Press 2004) and, with Jessica Kulynych, of “It May be Social, but Why is it Capital? The Social Construction of Social Capital and the Politics of Language” (Politics & Society, 2002).
- Karen Kedrowski
KAREN KEDROWSKI is Professor and Chair of the Political Science Department at Winthrop University. Her research interests include political communication, health policy, and education policy. Her publications include Cancer Activism: Gender, Media and Public Policy (forthcoming from the University of Illinois press), with Marilyn Stine Sarow. She is currently working on a book on breastfeeding rights in the United States with Michael E. Lipscomb.
- Joseph Ellis
University of Tennessee-Knoxville
JOSEPH M ELLIS is an instructor of political science at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville and a Ph.D. candidate at Temple University. His primary research interests are in post-Soviet economic and political transitions, especially issues relating to emerging market economies and taxation. He is the author, with Stephen Samuel Smith and Karen M. Kedrowski, of “Electoral Structures, Venue Selection, and the (New?) Politics of School Desegregation,” (Perspectives on Politics, 2004).
- Judy Longshaw
JUDY LONGSHAW is journalist who previously covered education policy in Rock Hill. She is active in the district’s educational affairs.